Hi, Erik. Welcome to EvC!
erikp writes:
By defining "true" as "can impossibly be contradicted by facts" (past or future), a thesis and its antithesis can both be true at the same time.
First, you've conveniently defined "true" to include unfalsifiability, which is obviously not compatible with Popperian logic. Yet, you still regularly appeal to Popper.
Second, I'd like to see an example wherein both the thesis and its antithesis are concurrently true.
Third, what does this have to do with science and religion having "explanatory space?" Make sure you relate your posts back to the topic of the thread.
-----
Since you're new at EvC, here are some helps:
The admins like you to use the premade quote boxes for quoting other posts. Use these codes (without the spaces) to make quote boxes:
[ q s ] Paste quote here [ / q s ]
Without the spaces, it ends up like this:
Paste quote here
Or, as Paul likes to do, you can use this one:
[ quote ] Paste quote here [ / quote ]
And it looks like this:
quote:
Paste quote here
Also, each message has a "Peek" button at the bottom of it, to let you see what codes were used in that message. And, on the "Reply" page, there's a list of "dBCodes" provided.
Edited by Bluejay, : Code problems
Edited by Bluejay, : No reason given.
-Bluejay
Darwin loves you.
™ Version 4.2
