Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0

Why are "Theological Creationism" and "Intelligent Design" bunched together on the same thread title? They're clearly different things, from a pro-ID perspective. In effect you are classifying them together by the implication inherent in the title of the thread!This seems to be a major case of question begging, biased to favour the Darwinian camp.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.

Ok, I see, like Theological Creationists can discuss evidence from Intelligent Design theory that supports their beliefs. I get it.However, to say: is the same question-begging as I thought the title was, and just as biased toward the Darwinian camp.It implies that NEITHER 'Theological Creationism' NOR 'Intelligent Design' are supported by scientific fact, and that's just not true of ID. (nor for that matter properly understood Theological Creationism, but that's another topic)
cheersEdited by Ed67, : No reason given.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.

Ok I completely understand you this time. That forum is for discussing non-scientific implications of ID theory. I apologize for speaking out in my ignorance, I can only say that my protest was made in good faith, although misguided by my assumptions.Lesson learned (again lol)

The personal abuse on the Intelligent Design threads is getting out of hand. If it doesn't stop, I will have to recommend disciplinary actions, or leave this board. There has been no meaningful discussion for the last couple days, and lots of personal harassment and insults. I'm talking about these threads :
'Is there a legitimate argument for design?' and
'The Semiotic argument for design'For instance, the latest thread in 'Legitimate argument' is this: Now, if that is the opinion of all of you Darwinists on this forum, just let me know and I'll take my leave.There's no understanding to be found under these conditions.

Well, as an administrator, it's your responsibility to enforce the rules that are intended to keep this forum civil.If it's your choice not to take corrective action, then I'll have to declare this forum a sham. I was promised "understanding through Discussion" not harassment by dog piling.You all know what you are doing. You can't refute my argument for design so you act dumb and start asking pre-high school level questions, nit picking and finally personal attacks. A little in the spirit of humour is entertainment. In these quantities, however, it's harassment and abuse.So you've ceased to entertain me.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.Edited by Ed67, : No reason given.