Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8937 total)
27 online now:
caffeine, PaulK, Tangle, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (4 members, 23 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Happy Birthday: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 861,770 Year: 16,806/19,786 Month: 931/2,598 Week: 177/251 Day: 6/59 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(4)
Message 2 of 707 (677698)
10-31-2012 10:39 PM


Alfred Maddenstein
There is way too much snark in his posts; it is totally unproductive, and wears thin very quickly. Here's an example:

Message 144

No, Tacky. Every experiment indicates waves thereby indicating there is a medium that allows the waving. No ether is postulated in the hypothesis. Your span of attention is too short. It is double helix ropes connecting all the atoms that is conceptualised, not ether as ether is contradictory too.

You are talking through your hat again. Photons are but mathematical entities. Remember, in the theory they are only counted and do not do any travelling anyway. It's waves again that propagate. That needs a medium necessarily. That is clear since there is no handless shake coming from you lot in my post. Only your usual spewing of second hand nonsense.

That is why the ropes are conceptualised rationally explaining a lot of phenomena as a result . If you can come up with a better explanation including a better fitting medium, please do. Until that time the Gaede's ropes trump anything else.


Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 11-01-2012 1:21 AM Coyote has not yet responded
 Message 4 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 11-02-2012 4:43 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 112 of 707 (690654)
02-15-2013 12:12 AM


CoolBeans
CoolBeans would be better engaging the comments in the threads he has started and stop proposing new threads.

He has been seriously taken to task in the C14 threads, and I'm waiting for some substantive replies.

Instead it looks like he is just proposing new threads in which to be wrong.


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers


Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Panda, posted 02-15-2013 8:26 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(2)
Message 126 of 707 (692514)
03-04-2013 11:43 AM


Our newest Archangel poster is just plain nuts:

Message 75


Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein

How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein

It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers


Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Theodoric, posted 03-04-2013 12:06 PM Coyote has acknowledged this reply
 Message 128 by Rahvin, posted 03-04-2013 1:34 PM Coyote has acknowledged this reply

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 161 of 707 (697072)
04-20-2013 11:17 PM


Dennis?
He's back???!!

Message 1


  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(2)
Message 177 of 707 (708874)
10-15-2013 8:42 PM


Time for summary?
Time for summary on the WTF is wrong with people thread?

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 182 of 707 (718583)
02-07-2014 5:57 PM


Jaf has lost it

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by RAZD, posted 02-07-2014 6:19 PM Coyote has acknowledged this reply
 Message 186 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-08-2014 10:36 AM Coyote has not yet responded
 Message 187 by jar, posted 02-08-2014 10:53 AM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 188 of 707 (718883)
02-09-2014 12:15 PM


mini-rant
Not suggesting any action, but this seems to be an inappropriate comment to post in the Science Forum:

Of course anybody who denies that the Bible is God's own revelation to us is going to have a problem with starting from the Flood, but since it IS God's own revelation to us it would be foolish for science NOT to start there, because in that case the Biblical revelation IS evidence, the primary evidence, and all the rest of the evidence has to conform to it.

Message 175

Maybe we need a "mixed" forum of some kind where these kinds of posts wouldn't be so out of place?


Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by AdminModulous, posted 02-09-2014 12:34 PM Coyote has not yet responded
 Message 191 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 12:57 PM Coyote has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 194 of 707 (718908)
02-09-2014 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by AdminModulous
02-09-2014 1:55 PM


Re: mini-rant
I see no reason to suspect its going to become any form of issue.

I certainly don't want to make it any big issue, that's why I put "no action needed" in my post.

But it is just unseemly that religion is being used as an argument to completely trash evidence, science, and the scientific method -- in the Science Forum.

But, carry on.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by AdminModulous, posted 02-09-2014 1:55 PM AdminModulous has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 2:12 PM Coyote has responded
 Message 197 by Admin, posted 02-09-2014 2:32 PM Coyote has acknowledged this reply

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 196 of 707 (718912)
02-09-2014 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by arachnophilia
02-09-2014 2:12 PM


Re: mini-rant
You're right!

I apologize. Got the forums mixed up.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 2:12 PM arachnophilia has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 235 of 707 (737774)
09-29-2014 10:54 PM


Spam
Spam

Message 1


  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 236 of 707 (737779)
09-30-2014 4:23 AM


Spam

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 237 of 707 (738021)
10-03-2014 10:20 PM


Spam
This and three previous are spams:

Message 1


  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 244 of 707 (741162)
11-10-2014 10:12 AM


Spam

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 253 of 707 (742803)
11-24-2014 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by michellebucks74
11-24-2014 7:15 PM


Re: The Vore Store
Spam immediately upthread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by michellebucks74, posted 11-24-2014 7:15 PM michellebucks74 has not yet responded

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 260 of 707 (745429)
12-22-2014 7:33 PM


Blog advertizing?
Blog advertizing?

Message 895


  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019