Summations Only

You both deserve to be pun-ished.

Well done.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step.

The National Geographic has some embarrassingly simplistic articles.
Often what was meant to be 'scientific' was 'opinion' instead.
Even my not-particularly-scientifically-minded girlfriend used to wince at the quality of the articles.
It didn't take long for us to cancel the subscription, as the only thing it offered of any worth was the photography.

Did you ever ask yourself why everyone you knew stopped returning your calls?

So, your answer is: "No, I have never asked myself why everyone I knew stopped answering my calls".Why do you think they all abandoned you?
What explanation would you assign to their behaviour?Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

So, you don't know why they all left you and you have chosen to never ask why.
That is not the behaviour of a sane person.

As you keep saying: you have no-one - not one friend.
You are alone with your madness.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!{abe}
In the expectation that you fail to understand: I am laughing AT you, not with you.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Why would we want to discuss anything with you, when you have clearly left reality behind.
Your grasp of English is far greater than your grasp of physics but, unfortunately, your grasp of English is poor and your grasp of reality has slipped completely.That link you provided is an embarrassment.
But the fact you think it is credible proves that you are beyond help.We are simply here responding to your trolling in whatever way we feel like.
You will keep spouting your nonsense and we will continue to treat it with the contempt it deserves.But, on the plus side, you can pretend that we are replacements for all the friends that you drove away.
We will give you the attention that you sorely need!!
Unfortunately, we don't give a shit about you.

Reading is your friend...

You asked why I was having a discussion with Mad.
My reply was that I am not having a discussion with Mad (because he is a troll).Are you now asking 'why' I am not having a discussion with Mad?
I think I answered that in my first sentence.

****Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

I tried reply in kind - using Mad's own posts from this thread.But his posts are such excruciating and turgid shit-lumps, that I found it wasn't fun and so abandoned the attempt.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Please quote where the rules of arithmetic say that multiplication by zero is forbidden.
(I bet you can't.)

Great.
All numbers can be multiplied by zero.
Multiplying by zero is not forbidden at all.Now show where the Big Bang Theory says that something is multiplied by zero.
(I bet you can't.)Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.