Faith writes:
The bottleneck you have in mind, Panda, occurred about 4300 years ago at the Flood, not 6000 which was the Creation. And my answer to that challenge is that how a recent bottleneck shows up genetically today, with its drastic reduction to homozygosity for all the traits that define the breed, otherwise known as "fixed loci," isn't how it would look after the Flood bottleneck when there had to have been far greater genetic diversity, meaning far more heterozygosity, also a great many more functioning genes which have since become dead or junk DNA... ...That would not have been the case when there was so much greater genetic variability than there is today.
So, according to you, removing 99.99% of the human population does not show up as a genetic bottleneck because you think there was massively more heterozygosity in the 8 people on the ark then in the 7 billion people that currently exist.
Faith writes:
If there was 98% heterozygosity before the Flood ...
We have DNA from people who lived more than 4300 years ago - and it doesn't show more heterozygosity.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane