Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8925 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-21-2019 11:26 AM
30 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, dwise1, GDR, Percy (Admin), ringo, vimesey (6 members, 24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,169 Year: 15,205/19,786 Month: 1,928/3,058 Week: 302/404 Day: 20/96 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism Road Trip
JonF
Member
Posts: 5346
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.4


(2)
Message 212 of 409 (680346)
11-19-2012 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 205 by Faith
11-19-2012 7:26 AM


Re: The ENTIRE geological column.
What I'm saying is that their general APPEARANCE, their CONDITION, is identical. There is not one iota of an appearance of difference to account for millions of years of age difference among them.

They are wildly and obviously differnt, even to the naked eye.

Really, this is ridiculous

Sure is.

How is this rock part of the geological column if it's formed 45 kilometers deep in the earth?

All rocks are part of the geological column.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by Faith, posted 11-19-2012 7:26 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 5346
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.4


(1)
Message 214 of 409 (680348)
11-19-2012 8:13 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Faith
11-19-2012 7:38 AM


Re: The ENTIRE geological column.
How is this rock part of the geological column if it's formed 45 kilometers deep in the earth?

We, and others, have thought about your arguments. They were shown to be false about 200 years ago, and nothing's changed since then.

You obviously haven't looked an any photographs of geological formations, or visited any. "Not an iota of differnce!" Why should anyone take your incompetent rehashings of long-refuted arguments seriously?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Faith, posted 11-19-2012 7:38 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 5346
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.4


(2)
Message 264 of 409 (680487)
11-19-2012 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by Faith
11-19-2012 4:29 PM


Re: It's God's own word
What I'm doing is taking what I understand from Geology and showing that it supports the Flood.

\
But you know nothing about geology. E.g:

quote:
What I'm saying is that their general APPEARANCE, their CONDITION, is identical. There is not one iota of an appearance of difference to account for millions of years of age difference among them.

Anyone writing that cannot be taken seriously, and hasn't even seen a picture of a geological formation (e.g. the Grand Canyon).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Faith, posted 11-19-2012 4:29 PM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by Faith, posted 11-20-2012 11:06 AM JonF has not yet responded

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 5346
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.4


(1)
Message 269 of 409 (680494)
11-19-2012 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 262 by Faith
11-19-2012 4:42 PM


Re: The ENTIRE geological column.
The Grand Canyon is the best example of it I know of.

It's picturesque, and it shows a portion of the geologic column, but it's far from the entire geological column.

But the Vishnu Group in the Grand Canyon is metamorphic and formed miles underground.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by Faith, posted 11-19-2012 4:42 PM Faith has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019