Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,445 Year: 3,702/9,624 Month: 573/974 Week: 186/276 Day: 26/34 Hour: 7/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Social Issues and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Cern Debate:

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cern Debate:
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 19 of 51 (678783)
11-10-2012 10:41 AM 		Reply to: Message 18 by tesla
11-10-2012 10:29 AM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
I'm saying the religious will help fund science to the end of looking for higher being.
​
If that were true it would simply show that the religious haven't really thought things through; that they are bent on destroying the very concept of a higher being.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by tesla, posted 11-10-2012 10:29 AM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by tesla, posted 11-10-2012 5:06 PM jar has replied
  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 21 of 51 (678816)
11-10-2012 5:23 PM 		Reply to: Message 20 by tesla
11-10-2012 5:06 PM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
Anything science can study can only be natural and so any god science might find, study, understand cannot be a higher being but just another natural thing we understand.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by tesla, posted 11-10-2012 5:06 PM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 8:19 AM jar has replied
  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 29 of 51 (678898)
11-11-2012 10:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 25 by tesla
11-11-2012 8:19 AM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
But just like physics, it would not be a higher being, just another natural being.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 8:19 AM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:17 AM jar has replied
  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 31 of 51 (678902)
11-11-2012 10:22 AM 		Reply to: Message 30 by tesla
11-11-2012 10:17 AM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
I cannot figure out your thinking...so...to you God is not natural?
​
Almost correct, any real GOD would not be natural.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:17 AM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:26 AM jar has replied
  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 51 (678908)
11-11-2012 10:37 AM 		Reply to: Message 32 by tesla
11-11-2012 10:26 AM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
By definition a real GOD is supernatural. Anything supernatural is not natural.
​
It really is that simple.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:26 AM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:45 AM jar has replied
  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 35 of 51 (678914)
11-11-2012 10:54 AM 		Reply to: Message 34 by tesla
11-11-2012 10:45 AM

Re: Philosophical jabberwocky
Then the god you are searching for is not supernatural.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 10:45 AM tesla has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by tesla, posted 11-11-2012 11:29 AM jar has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024