Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   States petition for secession
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 59 of 384 (688743)
01-25-2013 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by RAZD
01-24-2013 8:44 PM


Re: letting texas go?
Why should the federal government always be lumbered by restrictionists preventing progress?
Oh I agree, I agree, why should you? For myself I'd like to divvy the whole nation up between "restrictionists" and "progressives" and let each section govern itself. I SO wish it were possible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by RAZD, posted 01-24-2013 8:44 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 4:31 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 62 of 384 (688827)
01-25-2013 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 4:31 AM


Re: Secession
I know it's probably impossible, but I'm really serious, I'd love to hear ideas about how it might be possible somehow or other, perhaps laid out in stages.
Secession of individual states may not be impossible if there's a general agreement that it would be a good idea -- agreed by that 2/3 majority ICANT keeps talking about for changing the Constitution perhaps, or 3/4 or whatever's best, so that could be a factor. Perhaps we "restrictionists" could set up a new capitol, perhaps in Texas, and just divide the governing of the nation between two locations before trying to physically divide the people.
Anybody have any ideas?
Why should such utterly different philosophical positions have to be continually in conflict with each other? We would get along much better if we didn't have to be subjected to the other side's political decisions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 4:31 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 9:43 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 64 of 384 (688829)
01-25-2013 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by Coyote
01-25-2013 8:57 PM


Re: Secession
There is no doubt that the conservative nation would thrive and the liberal collapse but we don't need to tell them that. They'll be happy to get rid of us and the feeling is mutual so let them find out the hard way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2013 8:57 PM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 9:30 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 68 of 384 (688833)
01-25-2013 10:05 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by NoNukes
01-25-2013 9:43 PM


Re: Secession
I think we'd do fine if we separated. Take the scientists with you if they want to go. It would be easier on all concerned not to have the constant fighting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 9:43 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 10:35 PM Faith has replied
 Message 76 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2013 11:00 PM Faith has replied
 Message 84 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 11:22 PM Faith has replied
 Message 92 by vimesey, posted 01-26-2013 2:22 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 69 of 384 (688834)
01-25-2013 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 10:00 PM


Re: Secession
There's no need to argue all this here. California is a great producer, it is also on the verge of total economic collapse. How you put all that together I don't know but I'm willing to give up California and all the blue states to be free of liberal ideology. I'd really like to hear ideas about how that could be made to happen.
Ideally I'd want a CHRISTIAN state but I suppose bringing that about would be even harder than splitting red-blue. Much as a generally conservative mind set is far more desirable than the liberal, nevertheless I don't want to be governed by conservatives who deny Christ and insist on evolution either if it's possible to avoid it. What I'd like best of all is a nation governed as the original Puritans and Pilgrims governed theirs based on the gospel of Christ. Maybe at least one state within the new red region could be constituted that way.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 10:00 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Theodoric, posted 01-25-2013 10:42 PM Faith has replied
 Message 74 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 10:51 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 71 of 384 (688836)
01-25-2013 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 10:35 PM


Re: Secession
I don't want Fox News because they are Catholic. They have some good conservative stuff, but my ideal is the Puritan and Pilgrim model, updated and modified as necessary of course, but completely Reformed Protestant. Anyone can live in my state if they are willing to submit to the Reformed Protestant governing principles, but they can't have any political power. Still hoping for some ideas about how to reorganize America to make us all happy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 10:35 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 73 of 384 (688838)
01-25-2013 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Theodoric
01-25-2013 10:42 PM


Re: Secession
I keep hearing they're on the verge of collapse, that's all I know. If they aren't, fine, I couldn't care less. It's liberal ideology I want to be free of. Any ideas how to bring that about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Theodoric, posted 01-25-2013 10:42 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 75 of 384 (688841)
01-25-2013 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 10:51 PM


Re: Secession
Unfortunately most conservatives don't share my views on religion, they AREN'T Reformed Protestant. Catholicism ruled the Dark Ages, the Reformation pulled us out of them, but that's also something we shouldn't argue on this thread. Keep your ignorance of history, and your blasphemous snarky tongue and bless the blues with it.
Real ideas about how to pull off a great divorce between the reds and the blues and accommodate various subgroups as well, still invited.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 10:51 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 11:09 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 77 of 384 (688843)
01-25-2013 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Coyote
01-25-2013 11:00 PM


Re: Secession
I'm not interested in "advancing." Whoever came up with this bizarre notion that society must be continually "advancing?" To what? That's the tenet of Progressivism which is what the red region is to be free of. I want a STABLE society, a stable civilized CHRISTIAN society ruled by the gospel of Christ. Any ideas how to split the nation to make that possible?
You can have your own region, I'm all for that.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2013 11:00 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2013 11:13 PM Faith has replied
 Message 81 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 11:16 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 80 of 384 (688846)
01-25-2013 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 11:09 PM


Re: Secession
Yes, splinter groups can be a problem. Nevertheless I'd like to ponder the possibilities. ONE Puritan state would be fine for starters. Perhaps there is a predominantly red state somewhere that would like to vote itself for the experiment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 11:09 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 82 of 384 (688848)
01-25-2013 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Coyote
01-25-2013 11:13 PM


Re: Secession
There is nothing backwaterish or Amish-like about Reformed Protestantism, historically it is the REASON the west became so prosperous and advanced, although since you now define that concept to mean something else I just don't want to argue it, or any of the other redefined concepts with the prejudiced crazy people at EvC. I would just like to come up with some practical ideas on this thread that started out recognizing the desire of some states to leave this ideologically despicable Union and become independent.
Maybe it WOULD be possible to settle some counties in the Bible Belt for a start. That's an idea.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Coyote, posted 01-25-2013 11:13 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 83 of 384 (688849)
01-25-2013 11:22 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Dr Adequate
01-25-2013 11:16 PM


Re: Secession
Evolution. Which isn't an advance but since you think it is there's your answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-25-2013 11:16 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 85 of 384 (688851)
01-25-2013 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by NoNukes
01-25-2013 11:22 PM


Re: Secession
Sorry, I was assuming you'd all like just as much to be free of conservatives and Christians as I would of you. RAZD was expressing something along those lines back in Message 58 which is what got me into this. If not I guess there is no solution to be had or that anyone wants to consider.
It would be disruptive for everybody concerned you know.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

He who surrenders the first page of his Bible surrenders all. --John William Burgon, Inspiration and Interpretation, Sermon II.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 11:22 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 11:37 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 87 of 384 (688854)
01-25-2013 11:43 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by NoNukes
01-25-2013 11:37 PM


Re: Secession
The term "Christian" is terribly misused these days, alas.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 11:37 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by NoNukes, posted 01-26-2013 1:19 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 133 by Shield, posted 01-26-2013 7:33 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1473 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 88 of 384 (688855)
01-25-2013 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by NoNukes
01-25-2013 11:22 PM


Re: Secession
You are the one that cannot get along with scientists, Catholics, or liberals.
Not a problem "getting along," just don't want to be GOVERNED by the liberal ideology or the Pope. Get the difference?
Just how many people do you expect want to live in a Puritan theocracy anyway?
Far more than you have any idea, that's for sure, although many of them might figure they are of more use among the heathen where they can be missionaries.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by NoNukes, posted 01-25-2013 11:22 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by NoNukes, posted 01-26-2013 1:53 AM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024