Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wal-Mart files US labor charge against union
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 12 (680062)
11-17-2012 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
11-17-2012 11:59 AM


They should make the people stop protesting and Wal*Mart should use whatever workers they want. If Wal*Mart isn't cool about it then people should stop working and shopping there. Next they should lose enough business to make them smaller or even fail. Then we shouldn't have the problem anymore.
But that doesn't work because people won't stop shopping there because their prices are so low. The people need to wake the fuck up. I don't think that standing out front with signs does much of anything. Wal*Mart is obviously too big and getting evil. It sucks that the people need the court system to figure this one out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 11-17-2012 11:59 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by NoNukes, posted 11-17-2012 1:53 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 12 (680075)
11-17-2012 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by NoNukes
11-17-2012 1:53 PM


They should make the people stop protesting
Who are "they" in this case, and what law should they use to silence the protest.
Wal*Mart is filing charges that the protesters are violating the NLRA.
Or they could just be arrested for trespassing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by NoNukes, posted 11-17-2012 1:53 PM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by ringo, posted 11-17-2012 2:42 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 7 by Omnivorous, posted 11-17-2012 2:56 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 12 (680082)
11-17-2012 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by ringo
11-17-2012 2:42 PM


Or WalMart could put up big signs saying, "Buy something or get out!"
From the article:
quote:
Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart said that anyone who is not an employee is prohibited from coming onto its owned or controlled parking lots or other facilities to solicit, hand out literature or otherwise engage in any demonstration.
Its private property. The protesters should leave if they're asked.
Heh, I don't even think you can really be convicted for running those stop sign.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by ringo, posted 11-17-2012 2:42 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by ringo, posted 11-17-2012 3:27 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 9 of 12 (680101)
11-17-2012 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Omnivorous
11-17-2012 2:56 PM


Re: I'm stickin' with the union
I suspect Wal-Mart has waited this long only because arresting minimum-wage earning people on Medicaid (no benefits, since Wally will only give them part-time hours) during the holidays is not a hearts-and-minds winning move.
Cracking Wal-Mart's union-busting wall would be worth some civil disobedience time in jail. They have a long history of intimidating workers who try to organize; the NRLB has been largely ineffectual against this tactic.
I suppose they could force the picketers to the public right-of-way or sidewalk, with great publicity for the protests and little to no positive effect for WallyWorld.
Sure, I'm for whatever is worse for Wal*Mat.
Personally, I don't shop there: they suck the life out of small towns and rural communities, replacing small businesses with minimum wage dead-end jobs, while selling goods produced by the lowest bidder. What real savings they offer are often paid for by abusive labor conditions in other countries.
I don't think people should be rallying for making Wal*Mart a better place to work, they should be working to destroy it altogether.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Omnivorous, posted 11-17-2012 2:56 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Omnivorous, posted 11-17-2012 6:19 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024