Irrational? At the very least, isn't it widely known that the USA has a abnormally high rate of death by firearm to say, the Netherlands. At the very least, it's far from making things more save then more restricted countries. And in my book, only cold hard reason should have a influence on gun lawmaking. Emotion shouldn't have a place in this, especially if you take various human instincts into acount.
I might look for it tomorrow, but is there any well-checked study of instances where civillian guns actually managed to prove useful? Everyone is always using this argument, but when does the ''positive'' side of the right to own a firearm get put into real practice?
Edited by Kairyu, : No reason given.