Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,780 Year: 4,037/9,624 Month: 908/974 Week: 235/286 Day: 42/109 Hour: 4/4


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Gun Control Again

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gun Control Again
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1558 of 5179 (689346)
01-29-2013 10:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1555 by Percy
01-29-2013 3:46 PM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
Of course, unbeknownst to you the man next door has collapsed from a heart attack and has managed to reach EMT's who have instructions to break down his door, except the dispatcher gave them the wrong address. And so as the EMT's rush up to your door and break it down, you shoot them. Congratulations.
You forgot I have video of who is approaching my door and know who is there. So no I will not shoot the EMT. In fact they would probably bust out my back wall in the living room and I would have opened the door.
Percy writes:
Well, yes, that's pretty close to what we've been saying. We'd go even further and say that the practice and training have to be on an ongoing basis because these are highly perishable skills. Probably the training you've received in the military is now so stale that your high opinion of your ability to handle these situations is completely unjustified.
Do you ever read anyting? I have stated we go to the range regularly and while there we chew the fat with our friends to keep our minds sharp about things that are going on and we need to remember to stay safe.
Percy writes:
It's true whether you include suicides or not, but of course the number of gun deaths at the hands of non-criminals goes up enormously if you include suicides.
But the rate of suicides does not go down with less guns in the homes. They just find another way.
I have had suicide prevention training and repeat it every year to try to help people who have those tendecies. If someone is trully intent on commiting suicide there is no way to stop them. I lost a close friend to suicide. He failed the first time and we worked everyday doing construction work as well as working with his mind on his problem. He was an alocholic and was convinced that his daughter and wife would be better off if he was dead. Just a little shy of three years after his first attempt he succeeded.
In 2010 there was 11,078 gun homicides in the US.
In 2010 there was 19,392 gun suicides.
In 2010 there was 606 unintentional gun deaths.
In 2010 there was 278 justified homicides.
In 2010 there was 780 deaths in robberys
14/3% in home invasion making a total of 112 victims.
In 2010 there was 80 deaths in burglary, I will assume all in homes.
We have homeowners 278
We have crooks 192
Homeowner having guns come out on top.
Had not the homeowners had weapons or skills the totals could have read:
Homeowners 0
crooks 470
I am still trying to find numbers for family members killed by guns being in the home.
If you know where any is at please let me in on them.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1555 by Percy, posted 01-29-2013 3:46 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1562 by Percy, posted 01-30-2013 9:05 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1559 of 5179 (689347)
01-29-2013 10:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1556 by Straggler
01-29-2013 7:10 PM


Re: Fear (THE END IS NIGH)
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
Nor do I.
That is great.
But what if someone did kick your front door in at 2:30 in the morning, what would you do?
Lets take it 1 step further. The intruder is tryng to join a gang and his initation is for him to break into a house kill all the occupants and rob the house while gang members are watching the proceedings.
Now what you do? The answer to that is you would probably die as well as everyone else in the house.
Straggler writes:
Then why do you always go out armed?
For the same reason my car is insured everytime I take it out of the driveway.
I want both just in case I need them. All the time hoping I never need either.
Straggler writes:
In your specific case (if your weapons fanaticism and associated expertness is to be believed) I would suggest that it is more the tragic loss of freedom you have imposed on yourself as a result of your fanatical security obsession that is the greater issue.
That is very possible but I would never go out of my house without my belt on to hold my pants up either. And I don't have to think about puting my belt on or my shoulder holster.
I do not have to think about observing what is going on around me it has been practiced so long it is done by instinct. Lately I have been getting a bit lazy but these discussions have refreshed me quite a bit so I guess I owe everyone a big thanks.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1556 by Straggler, posted 01-29-2013 7:10 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1560 by Theodoric, posted 01-29-2013 11:20 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 1569 by Straggler, posted 01-31-2013 8:05 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1561 of 5179 (689351)
01-29-2013 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1557 by Theodoric
01-29-2013 7:41 PM


Re: Here you go
Hi Theo,
Theodoric writes:
Dead because of bad GPS
From what I read that was not a justified shoot and the homeowner will go to jail.
At his age he was probably in Nam. I know some of those fellows who have some real problems with reality. So I would want more information, before I could pass judgment.
I have a brother in law that was in Nam and he will not have any weapons in the house. He don't even want knives in the kitchen. He still has nightmares because of what he went through.
Now you can see why I want to be able to see who is at my door and I will take action if they kick my door in and enter my house.
Had that gentleman been in his house and they came up and kicked the door in and came in his housse he would have been justified to shoot those who came inside. But if they ran back outside he could not follow them as the danger would have passed.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1557 by Theodoric, posted 01-29-2013 7:41 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1563 by Heathen, posted 01-30-2013 9:55 AM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1564 of 5179 (689475)
01-30-2013 11:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1562 by Percy
01-30-2013 9:05 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
Is that what you do when you're home, keep your eyes locked on the video of your front door?
Please.
I would probably be in my yard by the time EMT got out of their vehicle from the sound of the sirens, to see which of my neighbors was in trouble.
Percy writes:
About your statistics, you need to cite a source, and then you need to explain how you concluded that 278 justifiable homicides were all committed by homeowners in defense of their homes, and where the 192 figure comes from. This is little better than your earlier attempt - you're just listing a lot of numbers and then baldly claiming they support your position.
I just assumed that anyone who had a CCP would own a home. It makes no difference where he/she killed the crook. He/she killed the crook to protect his/her life, or the life of others. He/she did that with the wepon he/she had on his/her person, which was in his/her house when he/she got home.
Here in table 11 you find 780 murders in robbery and 80 deaths in burglary.
Here In these facts you find that 14.3% of robberies take place in the home. So I used the 14.3% and let them kill all of them making 112 dead victims. I don't think there would be a death in every home robbery but I treated it as such.
Here you find that in 2010 there was 378 justified homicides. That is where a person uses lethal force to protect one's self 378 times.
You should be able to find all the numbers below in those references above.
quote:
In 2010 there was 11,078 gun homicides in the US.
In 2010 there was 19,392 gun suicides.
In 2010 there was 606 unintentional gun deaths.
In 2010 there was 278 justified homicides.
In 2010 there was 780 deaths in robberys
14/3% in home invasion making a total of 112 victims.
In 2010 there was 80 deaths in burglary, I will assume all in homes.
We have homeowners 278
We have crooks 192
Percy writes:
In 1993 the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) released a study that found that a gun in the home offered little protection but increased by around three times the risk of one household member shooting another. Subsequent research has supported this finding over and over again. For example, here's the abstract from a 2004 paper titled Guns in the Home and Risk of a Violent Death in the Home: Findings from a National Study:
I have read that report several times. So what sources do they use for their stats?
Percy writes:
In other words, having a gun in the home makes you less safe, not more safe.
Yes you make that statement and they make that statement but there are other studys that refute that study.
I have been putting the hard data from the FBI files in my posts.
Here you can find a study by Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig who are anti-gun proponents.
You need to download the pdf file to get all the information it is the second one down.
They say one would conclude that defensive uses are rare indeed, about 108,000 per year which = 295.8904109589041 per day which = 12 per hour or 5 per minute.
I would think that is not very rare but frequent.
They also cite other studies that go from 1.5 million to 3.1 million a day.
Just taking their rare number of DGUses your statement is refuted.
Here you can find a bias report going in the other direction.
But just going by the FBI raw data mankind is safer having a gun that not having a gun.
Did you know California leads the country with the most justified shootings? Here
quote:
Justifiable homicides are concentrated in just a handful of states. California, Michigan, Oklahoma and Louisiana, with only 18 percent of the nation’s population, account for nearly half the justifiable homicides by civilians.
I wonder why that is? They have strick gun laws. Maybe it is because the crooks are lulled to sleep about guns in the homes by all the talk about gun control and enter more homes that have guns in them.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1562 by Percy, posted 01-30-2013 9:05 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1572 by Percy, posted 02-01-2013 8:04 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1565 of 5179 (689476)
01-30-2013 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1560 by Theodoric
01-29-2013 11:20 PM


Re: Fear (THE END IS NIGH)
Hi Theo,
Theodoric writes:
I don't know if if happens everyday but I do know that juvinile gang kills 673 people per year or 1.8 every day.
And yes they do have such initations. As the new member can not then testify against the other gang members.
Source
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1560 by Theodoric, posted 01-29-2013 11:20 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1567 by Theodoric, posted 01-31-2013 12:17 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1570 of 5179 (689527)
01-31-2013 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1567 by Theodoric
01-31-2013 12:17 AM


Re: Fear (THE END IS NIGH)
Hi Theo,
Theodoric writes:
Cuz you saw it on TV?
No.
Cuz I existed as a teen ager in Niagara Falls for 2 years in the early 50's.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1567 by Theodoric, posted 01-31-2013 12:17 AM Theodoric has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1571 of 5179 (689528)
01-31-2013 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 1569 by Straggler
01-31-2013 8:05 AM


Re: Fear (THE END IS NIGH)
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
Well ICANT - It appears you are not nearly as prepared for the impending end of civilisation as you might have thought. Check this guy out:
A six month supply of food is not enough. It requires a year's worth to be able to grow a new crop of food. But that depends on the time of year also.
But I know people who are much better prepared that this fellow.
Straggler writes:
I suspect there is a far greater chance of me being mowed done by a bus as I cycle round London.
That is a definite possibility.
But why did't you answer the question?
Straggler writes:
Will you be following Erwin's example above?
I am satisfied with my preparations.
Straggler writes:
You'd better get to work on your underground bunker......
It is kinda hard to do that in Florida. The water table in my back yard is 7 feet down.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1569 by Straggler, posted 01-31-2013 8:05 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1573 by Straggler, posted 02-01-2013 9:06 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1574 of 5179 (689611)
02-01-2013 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 1572 by Percy
02-01-2013 8:04 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
But they didn't use their siren upon approach.
You got to be kidding. All of our emergency personel are voluntary, and they run the lights and sirens from the time they leave where the vehicles are parked until they get to the destination. I would be able to hear them from the time they left until arival at my house which would take about 2 minutes for one group as they are 4 blocks away, with the fire dept about 1 minute behind as they are 6 blocks away.
Percy writes:
I see now what you were trying to show with these figures. You're arguing that crooks kill more homeowners than vice-versa. Though I think your derived figures are likely in the right order or magnitude I don't think they're correct, but this isn't a point worth arguing because the point you're trying to make isn't one anyone thinks worth disputing.
No Percy, the crooks do not kill more homeowners.
The Homeowners were responsible for 278 crooks dying, while the crooks only killed 112 victims.
Had the homeowners not killed the 278 crooks there possibly would have been 390 dead homeowners or many more depending on how many people were in the house.
The numbers I used came from the FBI reports so you can dismiss them if you like, but you can't say they are wrong. Actually you could say they are wrong because you did. So maybe you did not even look at the sources I provided.
Percy writes:
thousands of times every year a gun owner's gun is used with murderous effect against themselves or people they know.
You keep saying that, as well as a lot of other people but where are the numbers, the facts is what counts.
People who commit suicide are going to commit suicide whether they have a gun or not so you can't count them.
Percy writes:
In answer to your question about sources, it's in the first sentence of the abstract that I quoted:
I knew what your source was. I was referring to what the authors source was. You do realize this is a 20 year old study.
Their statement: "Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide in the home." is true as shown by the numbers I gave you.
In 2010 there was 278 more justified homicides by individuals having a gun in their posession than there would have been had they not had a gun. But many and probably most of them would have been the homicide victim had they not had a gun.
And yes there were more suicides committed with guns where guns were in the house. But those without guns in the home found a way to commit suicide. Many even went and bought a gun and then went home and committed suicide with it. Some even waited years before going through with committing suicide.
So I would ask you to examine the FBI numbers and show me where your conclusion is correct.
Percy writes:
If you provide a link to the PDF I'll give it a look.
Here you will find the study.
As I said in my post these 2 getlemen are anti-gun and yet they say "one would conclude that defensive uses are rare indeed, about 108,000 per year" which = 295.8904109589041 per day which = 12 per hour or 5 per minute. Other studies go up to 3.5 million times a year. But this is what is said by anti-gun people.
Notice this study was done in 1997 when they say there was "nearly 200 million guns in private hands".
Here
In the appendix. Number of nonfatal gunshot injuries and firearm-related deaths in 1997, there was:
32,436 total firearms deaths.
13,252 total firearm homicides
17,566 total firearm homicides.
All these with less than 200 million guns in the hands of the citizens.
In 2011 there were:
32,163 total firearms deaths. down 267.
11,101 total firearm homicides. down 2151.
19,766 total firearm homicides. up 2200
All these with over 270 million guns in the hands of the citizens.
How does those numbers support your assertion?
"In other words, having a gun in the home makes you less safe, not more safe."
Source
There was over 70 million guns in the homes in 2011 than in 1997 and yet there was 267 less deaths by guns.
More guns in the homes does not equal more deaths from guns, but less deaths from guns.
Will you trust the numbers rather than studies that are paid for by anti-gun groups and even ignore what 2 anti-gun proponents have to say about 1 person every 5 seconds use their gun in self defense in some way.
Percy writes:
You might want to read that conclusion several times.
quote:
CONCLUSIONS: Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense.
Conclusion: the last main division of a discourse, usually containing a summing up of the points and a statement of opinion or decisions reached.
So a conclusion is a statement of opinion.
So the conclusion is the opinion of the people who wrote the study.
Buts lets examine the conclusion.
1. Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide attempt.
2. than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense.
According to the study I refered to by the 2 anti-gun proponents guns are used about 108,000 per year which = 295.8904109589041 per day which = 12 per hour or 1 every 5 seconds.
In 1997 there was a total of 84,200 non fatal gun related injuries that did not result in death. That is 1 in a little over 6 seconds.
A gun was helpful ever 5 seconds and harmeful every 6 seconds.
So a gun was more helpful than harmeful.
Percy writes:
No, ICANT, it doesn't. The FBI data shows that thousands of people are murdered every year just because there was a gun in the home.
In 2010 there was only 8,874 murdered in all situations with a gun and only 8,583 in 2011 a decrease of 291 yet there was millions more guns in the posession of citizens.
You just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.
Assertions that more guns equal more death has been refuted.
The truth is more guns equals less deaths. The numbers don't lie.
Percy writes:
Thousands more die of suicide, many of which would not have happened had there been no gun availaibing, studies showing that a significant percentage of suicides are impulsive, i.e., had five or so more minutes gone by the person would not have committed suicide.
Have you ever studied suicides or suicide prevention? I have, and try to refresh the course every year. If a person has come to the conclusion they have nothing to live for the suicide can only be prevented by them deciding they do have something to live for. If you can convince them that their life is worth something and they have something to live for you make keep them from commiting suicide. But many will later commit suicide as my friend did, that I spoke about earlier.
So don't give me a song and dance about a suicide being impulsive. It is a planed event as you see carried out in the mass killings, which usually end in the shooter shoting themself. There are mass killers that have no intention of dying. Example the shooter in the theater.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1572 by Percy, posted 02-01-2013 8:04 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1576 by Percy, posted 02-01-2013 1:45 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1575 of 5179 (689613)
02-01-2013 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 1573 by Straggler
02-01-2013 9:06 AM


Re: Fear (THE END IS NIGH)
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
I answered your question. Will you now answer mine?
ICANT - Who enjoys the greater freedom in your view. Man A or man B?
Man A lives in a situation where he genuinely needs to bolt his doors, set his alarms and persistently arm himself because there is a strong likelihood that if he doesn't he or his family will come to significant physical harm.
Man B lives in a situation where he can be relatively unconcerned about personal security because he is unlikely to be a victim of violent crime.
Who enjoys the greater freedom?
I know a lot of the people like man A who lived as you describe. In fact I was raised in such an environment in the 40's and 50's we did not even have locks on the doors. A rope through the door to the outside would lift the wood latch on the inside so it could be opened. But then my country changed when God got kicked out of school.
Now those people who are still alive prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
But all the people I know who go to the firing range live full happy lives, but are prepared for the worst if it happens.
We love to fish, hunt, bowl, golf, watch sports and have cook outs.
Since we live worlds apart in totally different environments I would say man A is happier, as he has no worries.
You seem to think I live a miserable life worrying about something that is never going to happen. I love what I do and take pride in being prepared if ocasion ever arises that I need to use that preparation. I enjoy going to the range and shooting whether it is in competition or not. I love fooling around with electronics that I use for detection. I am still trying to figure out how I can get the video pictures from my cameras on the TV while watching it like I can on the computer monitor. It is neat I can be typing this message on my computer in the back bedroom and if someone approached the front door their picture would pop up on my monitor, activated by a motion sensor. Now this part is a game with me.
But those idiots in America that live like man B who is unconcerned about personal security and sleeps with his doors unlocked is the easy marks that the criminal is going to go for. So without even knowing it he/she will more than likely become one of the statistics I have been referencing in my posts to Percy.
I am sure that all of the B men who are in denial would declare that they are happier, and they may very well be. But I don't think so because all they have to do is watch the TV news or read the paper and know they are in danger. Being in denial is not happiness.
Straggler writes:
Sadly I have little doubt this is true
National Geographic has done several pieces on people that are preparing for one kind of dooms day or another.
One man is building a castle in Tenn. He has a cellar bunker that has electricity, powered by solar, a deep well for water food supplies for 2 years. Enough amunition and weapons to start a small war. Above ground is 3 floors of living space with all sides of the house designed to give a full line of fire in all directions. Oh and I did not mention this house is on top of a mountain. He has already spent over a million dollars and still has much work to do.
Now I think that is a little overkill. But he and his children, and grandchildren work on the castle on the weekends. The activities with all the children involved looks to me to be a great educational tool as well as a family outing away from the city life. All the children and their spouses participate. How many family's get together every weekend and do something together? In the city he is an artichect. What they do together sounds like fun to me.
Straggler writes:
I pity you for that.
Don't pity me I enjoy what I do just as much as you enjoy taking a ride on your cycle.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1573 by Straggler, posted 02-01-2013 9:06 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1577 by Straggler, posted 02-01-2013 3:57 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1578 of 5179 (689625)
02-01-2013 6:24 PM
Reply to: Message 1576 by Percy
02-01-2013 1:45 PM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
ICANT, as I continue to apparently need to point out, the entire world is not just like you and where you live.
But you were not addressing the world in general.
You addressed me in a specific event and told me I would kill the EMT man/woman when they entered my house.
How else am I supposed to speak to you accusation, without answering a specific event?
Percy writes:
And I also apparently need to continue to point out that you shouldn't be holding yourself up as a typical example,
But I am typical of millions of gun owners.
Percy writes:
I am not dismissing the FBI data, nor am I claiming they are wrong. I am telling you, yet again, that you are using the numbers incorrectly. For example, if there had been a table showing that "In 2010 there was 278 justified homicides" it would be invalid to infer that they were 278 instances of homeowners shooting crooks.
Would you agree when you look at table 15 that there are 278 citizens that are armed who had a justifiable shooting in 2010?
You can find the correct table Here.
Percy writes:
But what you've done is far worse than making that incorrect inference because you apparently can't even read a table.
Nope just got the tables location mixed up.
Percy writes:
So do you understand now that the data you were basing your arguments upon was wrong?
I see where I got the tables mixed up but did use the correct number the first time I cited it, at 278.
If you notice in Table 15 the justified shoots increase every year.
Percy writes:
that's still no comparison to the thousands who die every year just because there's a gun in the house.
And the thousands you are talking about are the ones committing suicide which they would do regardless of whether there is a gun in the house or not. Most if not all probably purchased the gun for the specific purpose of using it to commit suicide.
Percy writes:
Out of time, maybe I'll look at the rest of your post later, though I don't hold out much hope for it since I see you've attempted to use statistics again. Not that that's a bad thing, I encourage the use of statistics, but what you're doing with them is more like making things up.
Nope, just mixing them up.
God Bless,
.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1576 by Percy, posted 02-01-2013 1:45 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1579 by Straggler, posted 02-01-2013 7:35 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1580 by Briterican, posted 02-01-2013 10:01 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1581 by Briterican, posted 02-01-2013 10:08 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1584 by Percy, posted 02-02-2013 6:25 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1585 of 5179 (689734)
02-04-2013 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 1584 by Percy
02-02-2013 6:25 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
Right now we have an ongoing situation of paranoia run wild in Alabama where a gun-toting survivalist has killed a school bus driver and taken a 5-year old boy hostage in his underground bunker (Authorities tight-lipped as standoff over child hostage enters 5th day).
You have a looney tune on the loose that was supposed to be in court the day after he shot and killed the bus driver for threatning neighbors branshing a gun.
Why was he on the streets instead of being observed and treated by the mental health profession.
So don't come at me telling me he was a survivalist. He was a man with a severe mental problem.
A survivalist is one who is prepared to defend him/her self family and posession from those who would harm them or take their posessions. They are not people who go out to the road and shoot a school bus driver. Or run around the neighborhood branishing their guns.
Percy writes:
Well, yes, I'm sure you are, and I bet that gun-toting survivalist is typical, too.
As I said that gun toting nut was on the loose because the justice system failed to do their job. Had they done therir job he would have been in a mental institution being evaluated as to whether he was a danger to society.
Percy writes:
it's reality we're hopefully trying to talk about here.
Then why not talk about reality, instead of spouting 20 year old conclusions as facts.
FACTS found Here:
The Pdf file does not have a quickview to be able to link directly to the file. So you need to click on
[PDF] Preliminary Data for 2011 - Centers for Disease Control to open the file.
Drug induced deaths 2010 40,393
Alcohol induced deaths 2010 25,692
Accidental poisioning and exposure to noxious substances 2010 33,041
TOTAL Intentional self harme (suicide) 2010 38,364
Intentional self harm (suicide) by discharge of firearms 2010 19,392
Intentional self harm (suicide) by other means 2010 18,972
TOTAL Assault homicide 2010 16269
Assault homicide by discharge of firearms 2010 11,078
Assault homicide by other unspecified means 2010 5,181
Legal intervention 2010 412
TOTAL Events of undetermined intent 2010 4,908
Discharge of firearms, undetermined intent 2010 252
Other unspecified events of undetermined intent 2010 4,656
complications of medical and surgical care 2010 2,490
Preventable medical errors 2010 98,000 deaths
Here
Percy writes:
This would be incorrect. By your own figures there were 11,078 firearm homicides in 2010. Between 50% and 75% of homicides involve people who know each other, so even using pessimistic assumptions, at least thousands of people are murdered every year simply because a gun was available when someone became angry or distraught or depressed or drunk or drug-ridden or crazy.
Here you will find expanded homicide data table 10 in which the victim is listed horozontal at the top and the circumstances listed verticle.
This chart is for all murders with all kinds of weapons.
I can not find one for just guns, so I don't have any idea where your or your source is getting the information for your assumptions.
You mentioned drunk, there was 121 murders due to alcohol.
You mentioned drugs, there was 58 due to narcotics.
In 2010
110 husbands were murdered by their wives or ex-wives.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
603 wives were murdered by their husbands or ex-husbands.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
107 mothers were murdered by their children or stepchildren.
NOTE: I will assume these took place in or on the premises of the homestead but no idea of weapon used.
135 fathers were murdered by their children or stepchildren.
NOTE: I will assume these took place in or on the premises of the homestead, no idea what weapon was used.
256 sons were murdered by their father, mother, step father or step mother.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
197 daughters were murdered by their father, mother, step father or step mother.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
88 brothers were murdered by their sisters or step sisters
NOTE: I will assume these took place in or on the premises of the homestead, with no idea of what weapon used.
19 sisters were murdered by their brother or step brother.
NOTE: I will assume these took place in or on the premises of the homestead, with no idea of what weapon used.
287 other family members were murdered by some family member.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murderor with what weapon.
2,723 acquaintances were murdered by an acquaintance.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
396 people were murdered by a friend.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
131 boyfriends were murdered by their girlfriend or ex- girlfriend.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
492 girlfriends were murdered by their boyfriend or ex-boyfriend.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place or who committed the murder, or with what weapon.
92 neighbors were murdered by their neighbors.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
8 employees were murdered by their employers.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
13 employers were murdered by employees
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
1,651 strangers were murdered by a stranger.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
5,724 unknown victims were murdered by unknown assailants.
NOTE: I have no way of knowing where the weapon came from or where the murder took place, or with what weapon.
So I have 349 murders that took place in a home by a weapon that was in the home. Although some of those counld have been brought in by the children.
349 is only .027% of 12,996.
For the sake of argument lets say they were all committed with a gun.
So if you want to show that your 50+% of murders is correct just because a gun was available you need to show how the weapon came from the house in which the victim lived.
Just a stupid question that you might be able to clear up for me.
Why has Uniform Protection Authority For Federal Reserve. purchased 1.6 billion hollow point rounds of ammunition over the last few months. These rounds are banned from warfare by the Geneva Convention
That is enough rounds to shoot every citizen four times and have rounds left in reserve.
This special police force is authorized by the USA Patriot Act of 2001 established in Section 364 of the Patriot act and answer to the Federal Reserve Banks only.
You don't use hollow point bullets for target practice, which they say is the reason for so many bullets.
And you wonder why I am so paranoid.
The smoke screen about saving lives is not the intent of Washington. The intent is to get all weapons out of the hands of the citizens.
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : Information for link
Edited by ICANT, : No reason given.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1584 by Percy, posted 02-02-2013 6:25 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1586 by NoNukes, posted 02-04-2013 11:45 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 1587 by Straggler, posted 02-04-2013 2:08 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1589 by Percy, posted 02-04-2013 5:57 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 1590 of 5179 (689822)
02-05-2013 1:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1589 by Percy
02-04-2013 5:57 PM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi Percy
Percy writes:
Except that until the murder and kidnapping he was just a patriotic American who had served his country and who believed he had a right to defend his property.
And is his defending his property what caused him to be scheduled to be in court the day after he killed the bus driver.
Percy writes:
What's scary is that he sounds a lot like you. I can just picture an angry neighbor (doesn't matter about what) screaming at you as he walks onto your property and you firing a shot into the air.
I bought my house in 2003 and all my neighbors was here then and are still here. Not a one of them know I have the Surveillance system that I do nor does any of them know that I even own a gun.
My neighbors have nothing to fear from me.
Unless they fear I will not be able to help them do things that they need to have done and can't afford to pay someone to do it.
Now the person that busts through my steel doors and enters my house is another story.
I have a empty gun rack in my truck so that anyone who would have bad intentions will know that there is guns in my house, and will have second thoughts about breaking in. The gun racks have been there from the first time my neighbors saw the truck but they have never seen a gun in them.
Percy writes:
That you went on to cite a bunch of data from this link about deaths due to alcohol, drugs,
You mentioned drugs and alcohol so I was putting some facts out there.
Did you notice how many deaths each cause?
How about the 98,000 per year that are killed in the hospitals by preventable mistakes.
Get rid of drugs and aolchol and save a lot of lives.
Get rid of doctors who bury their mistakes and save a lot more lives.
Percy writes:
This is much more relevant and is one of the tables people have been using during this discussion. It isn't very difficult to break it down into providing very useful information about firearm murders. If there were around 12,000 murders total and around 11,000 were by firearm, then it is a reasonable approximation to say that around 90% of all murders are by firearm.
There was actually 12,996 murders. The total by firearms = 8,775
Here
Making 67 % of murders by firearm.
Percy writes:
involved romantic triangles
Actually the chart shows:
Line 20 had Romantic triangle with a total of 90.
victims were:
1 husband, 1 wife, 1 daughter, 1 family, 52 aquaintance, 4 friends,
1 boyfriend, 9 girlfriends, 2 neighbors, 10 strangers and 8 unknown.
The husband, wife and daughter would have been killed by a gun that was in the house or one brought into the house. We will just say it was in the house.
All others would be brought to where the victim was.
Percy writes:
arguments, etc.
Money arguments are covered on line 24.
Other arguments are covered on line 25.
Percy writes:
(it's the unknown portion that accounts for why I cited the 50% to 75% range for the assailant being known to the victim).
It is unknown whether the people knew each other or were kin to each other. Yet you because of your bias choose to believe they all knew each other.
That is not scientific is it?
Percy writes:
This is the thousands of persons murdered annually that I keep mentioning, and that dwarfs the couple hundred homeowners killed by criminals.
We have 12,996 murders and only 8,775 firearms involved.
Total other weapons 4,221 = 0.481025641025641% of murders.
We have 5,724 unknowns total that it is not known whether they knew each other or were kin to each other.
If we substract the unknowns (5,724) from the firearms (8,775)
We have 3,051 then if we substract the strangers (1,615) we have
1,436. Which would be 16% knew each other.
Do you now see what you can do with numbers by making assumptions?
Go back and digest the numbers I posted in the post you replied too.
Percy writes:
This information, combined with the studies focused on the dangers of guns in the home, are how we know that anyone who purchases a gun for home defense is in the paradoxical position of having placed themselves at greater risk.
Another foolish assumption as I just showed you with the numbers above.
From table 10 show me which people were killed because they had a gun in the house.
You keep making assumptions and assertions. I keep asking what you base your assertions and you keep assuring me your assumptions are correct. But you have not presented 1 shred of evidence to support your assertion that because a person has a gun in the house they are more likely to be responsible for a murder taking place.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1589 by Percy, posted 02-04-2013 5:57 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1609 by Percy, posted 02-06-2013 11:45 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


(2)
Message 1591 of 5179 (689823)
02-05-2013 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 1586 by NoNukes
02-04-2013 11:45 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi No,
NoNukes writes:
Do we know enough about the perp to know whether he should have been off the streets?
His neighbors thought he should have been off the street.
NoNukes writes:
In my opinion, this last rant of yours is scary sounding stuff. Full of anti-government stuff along with a few things that I cannot make any sense of.
Why would a police force that is answerable only to the Fed as I asked in my post you made this reply to need to purchase 1.6 billion hollow point bullets for. You don't use hollow point bullets to target practice with as the fowl up the barrel and are much more expensive than regular bullets.
NoNukes writes:
Standard gun nut rant. None of the proposed federal legislation has any provisions that would remove guns already in the hands of citizens.
Go study history of countrys where they took away the guns of the citizens. You will find the first thing you have to do is get every gun registered. After all guns are registered the gestapo (private police force) can confiscate all registered weapons.
Did you know we had a private police force which is authorized by the USA Patriot Act of 2001 established in Section 364 of the Patriot act and answer to the Federal Reserve only?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1586 by NoNukes, posted 02-04-2013 11:45 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1592 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 8:09 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 1593 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 8:44 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 1594 by Straggler, posted 02-05-2013 10:21 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


(1)
Message 1595 of 5179 (689851)
02-05-2013 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1593 by NoNukes
02-05-2013 8:44 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi No,
NoNukes writes:
This is likely the same ammo that the police in Florida use. And if the police (federal, state, or local) are carrying the ammo, they are also training with the ammo despite the expense.
Well why should they worry about the expense they are using taxpayer money to purchase the ammo with.
Except since Sandy Hook they are having trouble getting ammo and weapons. Ammo is six months and weapons up to a year on backorder.
In military we always used jacked bullets to pratice with.
But I have checked and a lot of the police forces use hollow point bullets to practice with. Then they replace their weapons often.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1593 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 8:44 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1598 by Theodoric, posted 02-05-2013 11:23 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1601 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 12:02 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


(1)
Message 1596 of 5179 (689856)
02-05-2013 10:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1592 by NoNukes
02-05-2013 8:09 AM


Re: Some cases where guns would have helped and where they did help
Hi No,
NoNukes writes:
Is that sufficient reason for you?
Just about everybody in town knew who was involved in killing the bus driver and taking the kid before his name was announced.
If everyone knew who would be involved in such an incident when he was arraigned on the previous charge why wasn't he checked out by the mental health dept.
NoNukes writes:
Standard gun nut stuff. How many of those other countries had a second amendment?
What difference would it have made if they had a second amendment like we do? Our second amendment is being trashed everyday and will soon be of non effect.
The second amendment was written because the British tried to confiscate the guns of the colonist.
quote:
In April 1775 on orders from the Crown, British soldiers, or redcoats as Americans referred to them, marched west from their station in Boston to Lexington and Concord. They were to confiscate colonial weapons and gunpowder and capture John Hancock and Sam Adams, the leaders of the rebel militia. When local Patriots heard the purpose of the British troops, they sent Paul Revere and William Dawes on their famous rides to alert the countryside and warn Hancock and Adams that the British were coming.
Here
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1592 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 8:09 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1600 by Theodoric, posted 02-05-2013 11:32 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1602 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 12:10 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 1603 by NoNukes, posted 02-05-2013 12:13 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024