Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Gun Control Again

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gun Control Again
onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 2241 of 5179 (716705)
01-20-2014 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 2218 by New Cat's Eye
01-17-2014 3:01 PM


Re: And yet more shootings......
Is that all? According to this site, there have already been 34 shootings in Chicago alone this year in January 2014... you know, where guns were practically banned.
The continued go-to comparison of the gun nuts. Chicago!
You can ban all guns in violent, inner cities, where the ENTIRE system has failed the public, and of course there will still be violence.
There are plenty of places where strict gun laws have helped, along with better police presense and stronger community support, that has dramatically reduced gun violence.
I've presented NY in this thread before as one of those cities, that stepped up their police force and banned guns/added strict gun laws. Where gun violence has drastically reduced.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2218 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-17-2014 3:01 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2242 by Theodoric, posted 01-20-2014 2:53 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 2243 by ramoss, posted 01-20-2014 3:25 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 2245 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-20-2014 4:13 PM onifre has not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 2257 of 5179 (716895)
01-22-2014 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 2255 by New Cat's Eye
01-22-2014 10:16 AM


Re: wifebeating lunatics
So then, if the same thing is applied to different tests, and the results are wildly different, then we can figure that the thing wasn't a factor in the results.
Not really. It could just be the way it was enforced, or rather, more than likely NOT enforced.
Are the people who run NYC a bunch of criminals?
What's their police presence like?
How's their education system?
What's their percentage of blacks?
People here complain about everything just like in every other city.
Criminals are involved in our political system, I'm sure.
Our police presense is good, but I'm sure many would like more of a presense.
Education is rather good, but certainly not the best. The public schools have all the same issues as other places.
There are black people here, yes.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2255 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-22-2014 10:16 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(2)
Message 2261 of 5179 (716901)
01-22-2014 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 2260 by Theodoric
01-22-2014 11:19 AM


Re: wifebeating lunatics
He probably counts ALL Puerto Ricans and Dominicans as blacks too. Even the white ones.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2260 by Theodoric, posted 01-22-2014 11:19 AM Theodoric has not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 2280 of 5179 (717322)
01-26-2014 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 2273 by New Cat's Eye
01-24-2014 11:59 AM


Re: wifebeating lunatics
And if a State wants to keep bad people from getting guns
They might also want to prevent mentally ill people from getting guns. None of the shooters since Virginia Tech (that I can remember) have been "bad" people. From what all the evidence points to, they were good people. Some however, like the V Tech guy and the Newtown guy had serious mental issues.
"Bad" guys, like criminals trying to rob people, aren't usually in the business of shooting up malls and elementary schools.
Also, none of them have been black.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2273 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-24-2014 11:59 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2283 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-26-2014 12:00 PM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 2287 of 5179 (717339)
01-26-2014 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 2283 by New Cat's Eye
01-26-2014 12:00 PM


Re: wifebeating lunatics
For example, in addition to being kept from felons, the FOID card is kept from anyone who has been incarcerated in a mental institution.
That would still not help in cases where the person is quite ill but hasn't been incarcerated. Like for example with the V Tech guy.
Well, the laws I'm bitching about came before those incidences, so they cannot be a response to them. Laws that are meant to stop crazy people from shooting up schools, I haven't been talking about.
My point was in response to you addressing what each individual State should do. The current laws that are trying to be implemented, in some States, which I feel should be nationwide as Xong pointed out, are in direct response to some of the latest shootings.
But I will, got some examples?
I wasn't talking about laws that "prevent crazy people from shooting up schools". I was talking about laws that prevent crazy people from getting guns. There is a clear difference there.
A nationwide background check might be such a law that could help. Depending on how much is actually checked up on about the individual buying the gun. If it includes records of mental institutes or something like that, it would help. Also, everyone who registers as a gun owner goes through a yearly update check-up to see if anything new pops up about the person. Just because you're not crazy today doesn't mean you can't be crazy tomorrow.
What about the D.C. Sniper?
He was before V Tech, which I specifically used that event as my mark because of the DC sniper.
But we all know what influenced him... Islam!
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2283 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-26-2014 12:00 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2290 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-27-2014 10:40 AM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 2302 of 5179 (717488)
01-28-2014 9:52 AM
Reply to: Message 2290 by New Cat's Eye
01-27-2014 10:40 AM


NICS is garbage
Do you really think it'll help much?
I think it would help if the current system of excluding the mentally ill was changed to a better system.
The current system:
quote:
Only a small fraction of people with mental illness meet the federal standards for inclusion in the gun database. Those standards include a court ruling of insanity. Most, however, enter the database after they have been involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital. Further, most people who are involuntarily hospitalized typically under a 72-hour hold for observation aren't included in the database, because they cases never received a formal mental health evaluation by a judge.
The result is a system that misses many people who are at risk of harming themselves or others, while it sweeps in thousands of others who are no longer dangerous or never were in the first place.
This was from the LA Times
California has pretty strict background checks and a higher than most standard for the mentally ill. The problem? Neighboring states do not.
Result:
quote:
In 2006, former postal worker Jennifer Sanmarco returned to her old post office in Goleta and shot six people, then killed herself. Sanmarco had spent three days in a Ventura hospital after a history of bizarre and paranoid behavior and couldn't legally buy a gun in California.
But she had no trouble passing a background check when she bought her gun at a New Mexico pawn shop.
So there is one case where a nationwide, all states included, backgound check into the mentally ill would have prevented 6 people from getting shot.
As it stands now, our current system of background checks is shit, and not all states have the same criteria. Not all states even report everything to the NICS. There's no accountability, no one over seeing things, and it's left to fail.
So things can definitely be done a lot better, and that's just the first step.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2290 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-27-2014 10:40 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2306 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:20 AM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 2307 of 5179 (717495)
01-28-2014 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 2306 by New Cat's Eye
01-28-2014 10:20 AM


Re: NICS is garbage
Like what?
Umm, a nationwide system. Maybe modeled around Cali's laws for the mentally ill. Or NY's.
Something better than the current one.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2306 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:20 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2309 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:28 AM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(4)
Message 2312 of 5179 (717500)
01-28-2014 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 2309 by New Cat's Eye
01-28-2014 10:28 AM


Re: NICS is garbage
Well, you make them better.
Why are you being all cunty? I clearly wrote making it a nationwide law and I said we can model it after Cali's laws or NY's.
That wasn't a blanket "Let's make them better" reply. I gave you a tangible model we can use and I added that it be nationwide.
Hoooray!
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2309 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2313 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:35 AM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(2)
Message 2315 of 5179 (717503)
01-28-2014 10:43 AM
Reply to: Message 2313 by New Cat's Eye
01-28-2014 10:35 AM


Re: NICS is garbage
If its so tangible, then why do I know nothing about it?
Throw me a bone here. Links man, links.
I have no fucking clue what you're talking about brotha. I did provide a link from the LA Times that covered Cali's excellent mental illness laws as it relates to gun control. So there is a link.
It's a pretty good model to use as a nationwide law. Of course you've never heard of this because I just presented it as an idea.
Take a moment and breathe a bit. Read calmly, then reply.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2313 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:35 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2316 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 10:48 AM onifre has not replied
 Message 2320 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 12:40 PM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 2321 of 5179 (717515)
01-28-2014 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 2320 by New Cat's Eye
01-28-2014 12:40 PM


Re: NICS is garbage
"Yeah, background checks are not the way to go."
You did? That's great. Why though?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2320 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2014 12:40 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2325 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-29-2014 10:00 AM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 2334 of 5179 (717766)
01-31-2014 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 2325 by New Cat's Eye
01-29-2014 10:00 AM


Re: NICS is garbage
Too many issues that would need to be worked out to make it effective
Let's say you know that for a fact. Which you don't. But let's say you do. If law makers were able to work out all those issues so that it was effective, would you be in favor of it?
and those efforts would be better spent on other avenues.
I don't know what you mean by that. If you mean, like you posted earlier, that they provide better care for the mentally ill then I agree. But that doesn't help because we are already talking about people who have had mental health care.
Also, just providing more care doesn't mean they will get the care. You can't force them to in many cases. So there's that to contend with also.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2325 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-29-2014 10:00 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2979 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 2439 of 5179 (725840)
05-02-2014 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 2432 by Jon
04-30-2014 10:33 PM


Re: Responsible Gun Owner News
There is good reason to be wary of guns that can be armed and disarmed via a radio-controlled computer chip.
You think they can't already do that? All guns can currently be controlled by radio signals.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2432 by Jon, posted 04-30-2014 10:33 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2440 by AZPaul3, posted 05-02-2014 5:41 PM onifre has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024