Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Off Topic Posts aka Rabbit Trail Thread - Mostly YEC Geology
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 409 (684869)
12-19-2012 4:07 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Faith
12-17-2012 4:32 PM


Faith writes:
That's REAL science. Real science that is testable and replicable and all that yields real useful results. Real science is not in conflict with the Bible. I'm talking about the sciences that deal with the past where all you have is untestable speculations and they always contradict the Bible. As I keep saying that is their problem, not the Bible's. Also, they yield no practical technological results either.
Quite often the same theories have practical technologies as an outcome and lead to predictions that the world is billions of years old.
For instance an MRI machine uses quantum field theory. Since you would count an MRI machine, I hope, as a practical technological result, that means quantum field theory is "REAL" science.
However quantum field theory also says the world is 13.7 billion years old, at least.
Your distinctions have no merit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Faith, posted 12-17-2012 4:32 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 12-19-2012 5:12 AM Son Goku has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024