Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Have You Ever Read Ephesians?
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 19 of 383 (687067)
01-07-2013 11:41 AM


Pauline Collection Cover Letter
Jlicher and Goodspeed suggested that Ephesians may have served as an introduction to the collection of Pauline letters.
Some earlier manuscripts do not have the phrase in Ephesus in them, which is why some scholars believe it to be a circular letter and not one written specifically to the Church at Ephesus. (as has been mentioned earlier)
Per Goodspeed in An Introduction to the New Testament, The Epistle to the Ephesians:
Ephesians is a great rhapsody on the worth of the Christian salvation. Like Hebrews it belongs to an age when men needed to reflect on the worth of their faith. The situation lying back of it is twofold: the sects are beginning to appear, and the Pauline letters have been discovered and collected. To introduce this collection to Christians everywhere, to remind apathetic Christians of the great values of their faith, and to check the rising tide of sect and schism Ephesians is written.
As I understand it, pseudography was not a problem in ancient times unless one did so to deceive for some purpose. I don’t see Ephesians as a document to deceive, but to give readers an idea of what to expect when they read the letters of Paul.
Even though the situations addressed by Paul to specific churches had since passed by the time Ephesians is considered to be written by some scholars, that doesn't negate the basics of Paul’s life lessons.
Second-generation Christianity needed to be reminded of the great religious values it had inherited, as the Revelation and Hebrews show. Ephesians opens with a jubilant summary of Pauline thought, 1:3-14. The writer sets forth the supreme worth of Christianity, which his contemporaries were in danger of forgetting, 1:15-23. The Christian experience is nothing less than a new life through the mercy of God, 2:1-10. The death of Christ has opened to the Greeks a way to God, 2:11-22.
Paul in his writings has declared the Greeks' full rights in Christianity, 3:1-13, as they will see when they read his letters.
Basically, keep moving forward, treat others well, and don’t fall back to old bad behavior.

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Phat, posted 01-07-2013 3:09 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 28 by Richh, posted 01-08-2013 7:35 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 195 by Richh, posted 02-11-2013 10:59 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 25 of 383 (687123)
01-07-2013 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Phat
01-07-2013 3:09 PM


Re: Pauline Collection Cover Letter
quote:
Which again gets back to the question. Is an exhortation to "walk in the Spirit" a suggestion or a command? I always believed that the Lord loves a cheerful ( and willing) giver. By that, I mean that I wont force myself to give or serve...I will but force myself to submit to the Holy Spirit.
I don't see an exhortation to "walk in the spirit" in Ephesians. The first chapter just speaks of blessings and prayers. Paul gets into "walking in the spirit" in Galatians. If this debate is about Ephesians, I don't see the relevance of the question.
quote:
so my question is this: Do I do good works as a discipline to attain spiritual maturity or does Spiritual Indwelling(also maturity) cause me to do good works?
I tend to believe that trusting and allowing Gods Spirit to indwell me allows me to cheerfully and willingly do good works.
I don't like the idea that I am commanded to do good works as a condition of my existence.
Again, I don't see the relevance of the question given what is written. I don't think Ephesians can help you. Paul's letter contain his arguments and reasoning.
quote:
In other words, by Him making me alive in Christ, I am willing and able to do good works. Comments?
Verses 8-10 probably answer your question. I don't think it deals with ones willingness.
8For it is by grace you have been saved, through faithand this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God 9not by works, so that no one can boast. 10For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
I don't think the author is saying that "making one alive in Christ" forces one to be willing and able to do good deeds. He's summarizing Paul's argument concerning adoption into God's chosen family.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Phat, posted 01-07-2013 3:09 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by jaywill, posted 01-08-2013 5:54 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 30 by jaywill, posted 01-09-2013 6:11 AM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 31 of 383 (687281)
01-09-2013 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by jaywill
01-09-2013 6:11 AM


Re: Making Alive in ch. 1
Your Message 27 and Message 30 are just long versions of saying what I already said.
"Walk in the Spirit"
Apparently I wasn't using exhortation correctly based on Phat's question in Message 22. My point was that the phrase isn't used in Ephesians. Now that I've looked up the meaning and find that exhortation is inciting by argument or advice, I agree and had already stated in Message 19 that the author was saying that believers shouldn't fall back to old bad behavior. That was Paul's point in Galatians 5. They were to conduct their lives by thinking of others and not just their own needs. Galatians 5:16-25
"Alive in Christ"
quote:
Ephesians takes unbelievers from the place of being "alienated from the life of God" (4:18) to being partakers of "sonsship" (1:5), ie. sharing the begetting Father's divine, uncreated and eternal life.
I said in Message 25 that the author was summarizing Paul's argument concerning adoption into God's chosen family and you've provided the long version. Thanks for the confirmation.
What I've presented is that Ephesians is probably a cover letter for a collection of Pauline letters. The author is summarizing Paul's theology. Explanation or deeper understanding of what the author is talking about can probably be found in the Pauline epistles. Message 19

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by jaywill, posted 01-09-2013 6:11 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by jaywill, posted 01-09-2013 8:35 AM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 47 of 383 (687391)
01-10-2013 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by jaywill
01-09-2013 8:35 AM


Turn Over A New Leaf
quote:
Maybe I do not understand you well. Maybe I am not being fair.
But we have to be careful, or at least I as a Christian, have to be careful not to try to pour new wine into old wineskins.
Walk by the Spirit is nothing like "Turn over a new leaf". It is nothing like Self correction and self reform.
Walk by the Spirit is not self cultivation. It is not a humanistic self improvement. And it is not like the Chinese Confucius teaching of developing the "bright virtue" within.
I try to avoid using idioms without providing explanations. I'm trying to look at the reality and practical application.
The new and old wine parable is not part of Paul's teaching and really concerns a different issue than self correction. That's really a different debate.
Greeks choosing to change from previous Greek lifestyle and belief system to a Christian lifestyle and belief system is like turning over a new leaf. Believing in Christ is a choice. Leaving the old ways behind is a choice. Supposedly once that choice is made, the Holy Spirit is to help believers with self control in maintaining that choice. Per Paul, self control is a fruit of the spirit. (Galatians 5)
Since this letter is urging people to remember and urging them to live a life worthy of the calling they received (Ephesians 4), there is an element of self in the equation. We are still responsible for our choices and even conducting our lives "by the spirit" requires daily choices on our part.
quote:
A good and kind Unitarian does not walk by the Spirit in this sense.
A ethical Buddhist or even a morally astute Atheist does not "walk by the Spirit".
They choose not to be guided by the Christian Holy Spirit; but right behavior is right behavior whether guided by a belief system or not.
This debate is about the Christian lifestyle not any other.
quote:
You will detect in my response some caution about surrendering up the unique New Testament exhortation to walk by the Spirit to mean a religious or humanistic desire to give a fresh go at being a good person by one's own natural energies.
Turning over a new leaf doesn't automatically mean taking a fresh go a being good. It is just a change in one's actions or attitude. Could be good or could be bad. To repent is to change one's mind or purpose. Each person is going to have their own way of changing their life style if they choose. Christians choose to follow the ways of God/Jesus.
No matter how one spins the religious verbiage; individuals have to make a choice.
Believers choose to surrender, they aren't forced to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by jaywill, posted 01-09-2013 8:35 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 9:56 AM purpledawn has replied
 Message 51 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 11:20 AM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 50 of 383 (687395)
01-10-2013 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by jaywill
01-10-2013 9:56 AM


Re: Turn Over A New Leaf
It's still just Christian verbiage for making a change. Being born again is change.
I'm not disagreeing that the NT writers were presenting a supernatural element that goes along with the choice to believe, but they also didn't negate the individuals responsibility for their choices in their daily lives.
Ephesians shows this by encouraging people to persevere, keep on track. If the supernatural took over with no interference from the individuals mind, then they wouldn't stray and wouldn't need encouragement. Believers couldn't be tempted.
Some Christians were getting apathetic.
Goodspeed on Ephesians
In a prayerful appeal the writer sets forth the grandeur of the Christian's experience of Christ's love, and an exultant doxology marks the conclusion of the main part of the epistle, 3:14-21
Christians must be united against the sects, 4:1-15 There is but one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all. We must not be blown about and swung around by every wind of doctrine through the trickery of men with their ingenuity in inventing error. Christians must live the new, upright life of purity, patience integrity, and forbearance, 4:17-5:2. They must give up their old sins and live in the new light, 5:3-21. The marriage relation is made the symbol of the union of Christ with the church, 5:22-33. Children, parents, slaves, and masters have their special duties as Christians, 6:1-9. They must all put on the Christian armor and carry on the Christian warfare, 6:10-20. The farewell, 6:21-24, mentions Tychicus, Paul's well-known messenger of Col. 4:7, Acts 20:4. This is a part of the Pauline disguise, like Timothy in Hebrews 13:23 and Silvanus and Mark in I Pet. 5:12, 13.
Reminders wouldn't be necessary.

"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." -- Max Planck

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 9:56 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 11:46 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 55 of 383 (687408)
01-10-2013 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by jaywill
01-10-2013 11:20 AM


Re: Turn Over A New Leaf
I'm not sure why you find what I've said to be difficult or feel the basics are different than what you're presenting or what Ephesians is presenting.
I just left out all the religious verbiage.
I haven't presented that the author of Ephesians says we should be separate from Christ. This thread deals with Ephesians, which pertains to Christians.
quote:
By choosing another way to live, you are not saved.
By choosing to not be led by the Holy Spirit, you remain dead in offenses.
If you could choose to live right from today on, (which you will fail at in some degree), your offenses of yesterday and before are still before God. So you need redemption from all past offenses. And you need provision to live unto God for the future by the Spirit of Christ.
quote:
But man's first obligation is to believe into Christ to be redeemed and to be made alive. Message 52
I haven't presented anything to the contrary either. As Paul pointed out, all one needs is belief to be adopted.
Paul was trying to bring these people into the family of the God of Abraham. Paul's overall point is that the Jews weren't chosen because of their stellar behavior. Abraham believed in the one God and God chose to protect Abraham and his descendants. But...within that chosen group, those who were in right standing with the God of Abraham were the ones who were behaving.
Paul presents the Gentiles as adopted into that family. His argument is that they weren't adopted in because of stellar behavior, but through belief just like Abraham. (Romans 4) But...being part of the family also means one has to behave according to the rules of the family. All are loved, but all are to behave or suffer the consequences. (Romans 6-7)
Getting into God's family takes belief, but being in right standing with God takes right behavior. Unbelief gets one removed from the family, not wrong behavior. (Romans 11)
The author of Ephesians is talking to Christians, not people who have not chosen to believe in Christ. So they are already adopted into the family or saved if you wish. They may be getting lax in their behavior: not taking care of others or family as they should or straying from the path once too often, etc. He is spurring them to remember and get back on the path.
quote:
The world current is always in the opposition to God. The current of the world society is ever away from God. To walk in Christ is against the current and against the dowmward flow of the whole world.
So exhortation is needed. So the more experienced must encourage the learning. The steady must help the floundering. And our brother Paul wrote some 13 or so letters to assist the floundering. They are his letters in the New Testament. Message 52
Those floundering have to make a choice to read the letters. Those not floundering have to make a choice to help those who are floundering.
Christians make daily choices to continue on the path or not, to continue to believe or not.
Since I'm only talking about Christians, I'm not sure why you feel my posts are contrary to what you are saying or what Ephesians is saying. You're basically confirming what I've said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 11:20 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 2:45 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 58 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 3:44 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 57 of 383 (687428)
01-10-2013 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by jaywill
01-10-2013 2:45 PM


Re: Turn Over A New Leaf
quote:
"Religious verbiage" ... "religious jargon" ... however you'd like to speak of the terms and phrases Paul uses, which I think are under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Econcomy, dispensation, head up, redemption, made alive, sonship .. I will continue to use good translations of the Greek words actually written by the Apostle Paul.
I certainly have no reason to despise such phrases. And I let you use your kind of verbiage such as "life-style".
The debate isn't about whether you can use the verbiage. That's your thing.
My point is that you're restating what I have said in a longer fashion. I don't see the point of doing that in response to my posts.
I haven't presented anything contrary to what is written in Ephesians or Paul's writings.
Not sure what your issue is with what I've posted.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 2:45 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 4:17 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 61 of 383 (687464)
01-10-2013 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by jaywill
01-10-2013 4:17 PM


Dead and Alive
quote:
Hardly anything in the behavior exhorted and taught in the whole book is possible apart from being made alive in Christ.
If it were the case, Christ and His work would be unneccesary.
Nothing in Ephesians even suggests that God can fulfill His eternal purpose outside of Christ as the sphere of His operation.
I haven't suggested that the author is saying one can succeed apart from Christ. Refer back to the question that Phat asked.
Dead in sins is being apart from God/Christ, IOW not under his influence or protection. Alive in Christ/God means no longer apart from his influence or protection.
An alive-in-Christ-walking-with-the-spirit-born-again Christian is still capable of deciding not to do a good deed; but as I pointed out, according to Paul, that doesn't remove them from God's presence.
Being alive in Christ influences one to do good deeds, but I don't see that either author suggests that that influence forces one to do good deeds. The important word here is force.
The Holy Spirit supposedly guides. Galatians 5:16

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 4:17 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by jaywill, posted 01-11-2013 10:13 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 62 of 383 (687493)
01-11-2013 8:35 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by jaywill
01-10-2013 5:12 PM


Re: The Christ of Ephesians
quote:
In Philippians the same apostle writes "For it is God who operates in you both the willing and the working for [His] good pleasure." (Phil. 2:13)
This verse isn't saying that God goes in and rewires the believers brain so that the believer is no longer capable of choosing wrong or failing to help others.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
(1) It is not God who acts for us. He leads us to "will and to do." It is not said that he wills and does for us, and it cannot be. It is man that "wills and does" - though God so influences him that he does it.
I look at it as God helping to strengthen the believer's good inclination (yetzer tov).
Jewish Beliefs about Human Nature
According to this view, the yetzer tov is the moral conscience that reminds a person of God's law when one considers a specific action or choice. The yetzer ra is the impulse to satisfy one's own needs and desires. There is nothing intrinsically evil about the yetzer ra, as it was created by God and is natural to humankind. It is also what drives us to good things such as eating, drinking, having a family, and making a living. However, it can easily lead to sin when not kept in check by the yetzer tov.
IMO, right choices strengthen the good inclination.
Introducing Paul's writings to apathetic Christians would be a good way to help them persevere and get back on track. Get back to listening to their good inclination.
Nothing I've presented argues for the idea that Ephesians says that one has salvation through good behavior. Like I said before, the letter is for believers. They are already saved.
Your pushback possibilities are off track. You're just creating your own opposition. This debate isn't about what we care about, it is about what Ephesians actual says.
My position is that it is a summary of Paul's theology presented in his letters.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by jaywill, posted 01-10-2013 5:12 PM jaywill has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 79 of 383 (688171)
01-20-2013 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by Richh
01-19-2013 6:45 PM


Re: Authenticity?
quote:
If I started a rumor that Plato didn't write the Republic and perhaps that Socrates did not even exist, could you disprove me?
Not a good analogy. The dispute over the authorship of Ephesians isn't based on a rumor.
A Sermon on Ephesians
The Epistle to the Ephesians, often shortened to Ephesians, is the tenth book of the New Testament. Its authorship has traditionally been credited to Paul, but it is considered by some scholars to be Deutero-pauline, that is, written in Paul's name by a later author strongly influenced by Paul's thought. Bible scholar Raymond E. Brown asserts that about 80% of critical scholarship judges that Paul did not write Ephesians, while Perrin and Duling say that of six authoritative scholarly references, "four of the six decide for pseudonymity, and the other two (PCB and JBC) recognize the difficulties in maintaining Pauline authorship. Indeed, the difficulties are insurmountable."
Is the letter reliable? My question would be reliable as what? It's a letter. As I stated earlier, some scholars feel it is a summary of Paul's theology and probably an introduction to the collection of Pauline letters. Message 19
Eph also refers to most of the other letters of Paul. In many ways it seems like a summary of Paul's ideas, written by a disciple of his, and brought up to date for the Church of his own time.
The author presents a more universal church than existed in Paul's time.
Eph shows that the Church is becoming an advanced and powerful universal institution (rather like the Church today). In Paul's time there did no universal Church in that sense, but only informal gatherings of individual believe communities.
It is a letter written to believers, not nonbelievers. It is a letter encouraging believers to persevere. Ignatius gives similar encouragement in his letter to the Ephesians and brings them up to date for their time. As noted below, one should "look upon the bishop as we would upon the Lord Himself."
The Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians
Now the more any one sees the bishop keeping silence, the more ought he to revere him. For we ought to receive every one whom the Master of the house sends to be over His household, as we would do Him that sent him. It is manifest, therefore, that we should look upon the bishop even as we would upon the Lord Himself. And indeed Onesimus himself greatly commends your good order in God, that you all live according to the truth, and that no sect has any dwelling-place among you. Nor, indeed, do you hearken to any one rather than to Jesus Christ speaking in truth.
Unfortunately we don't know how pseudographic letters were presented to the audience of the time. Early Christianity was chaotic.
Pseudepigraphy was a commonly accepted practice in the ancient world, unless it was recognized as a deliberate deception. If one is going to look at reliability, one needs to look at the purpose of the letter. Was the main purpose to deceive? I don't see deception as the main purpose of the letter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Richh, posted 01-19-2013 6:45 PM Richh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Richh, posted 01-21-2013 6:24 AM purpledawn has replied
 Message 83 by jaywill, posted 01-21-2013 12:49 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 81 of 383 (688253)
01-21-2013 8:13 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Richh
01-21-2013 6:24 AM


Authenticity vs Reliabililty
quote:
Do consider this an open-and-shut case, an irrefutable conclusion or are there two sides to the argument - that this epsitle is pseudepigraphical?
As we sift thorough the information in the links I provided earlier, we see that Bible scholars are divided on the issue of authenticity.
There is a difference between authenticity and reliability. Although the letter may not have been written by Paul, did it summarize Paul's theology accurately? If yes, then the letter provided reliable information concerning Christian values of the time.
The Deutero-Pauline Letters
Note: Judging a particular letter to be pseudepigraphic does not mean that it is any less valuable than the other letters, but only that it was written later by someone other than Paul.
  • All thirteen of the letters attributed to Paul are still considered canonical; all of them are still part of the Holy Bible and foundational for the Christian Church.
  • Distinguishing the letters based on actual authorship, however, allows scholars to see more clearly the development of early Christian theology and practice.
The letter is no different than the copious books at a Christian bookstore all trying to tell the believer how to apply the "word of God" to current issues.
While pseudonyms are acceptable today, pseudography not so much; but pseudography wasn't uncommon in the first century.
Apocrypha of Jewish origin
Ancient literature, especially in the Orient, used methods much more free and elastic than those permitted by our modern and Occidental culture. Pseudographic composition was in vogue among the Jews in the two centuries before Christ and for some time later. The attribution of a great name of the distant past to a book by its real author, who thus effaced his own personality, was, in some cases at least, a mere literary fiction which deceived no one except the ignorant.
Ancient pseudography doesn't automatically mean the information in the writing is false or unreliable.
The letter made it into the canon.
The Canon of the Bible
Canonical books are those books which have been acknowledged as belonging to the list of books the Church considers to be inspired and to contain a rule of faith and morals. Some criteria used to determine canonicity were
  • special relation to God, i.e., inspiration;
  • apostolic origin;
  • used in Church services, i.e., used by the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit.
The Christian canon(s) have been developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities of the time. Believers consider canonical books to be inspired by God or to express the authoritative history of the religion.
The Reality of the Biblical Canon
Whether the letter is pseudographic or not does not change the contents of the letter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Richh, posted 01-21-2013 6:24 AM Richh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by jaywill, posted 01-23-2013 4:26 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 351 by Richh, posted 03-30-2013 3:29 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 86 of 383 (688313)
01-21-2013 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by jaywill
01-21-2013 12:49 PM


Re: Authenticity?
quote:
Purpledawn, Please explain what you mean by this.
Do you mean that Jesus Christ presented NO concept of a universal church ?
Keep on track. This debate is about Ephesians and Ephesians was either written by Paul or by another. I have presented the idea that it is written by another as a summary of Paul's theology.
The link I provided in Message 79 listed several reasons why Ephesians is not considered to be written by Paul. I quoted this one.
A Sermon on Ephesians
Eph shows that the Church is becoming an advanced and powerful universal institution (rather like the Church today). In Paul's time there did no universal Church in that sense, but only informal gatherings of individual believe communities.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by jaywill, posted 01-21-2013 12:49 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by jaywill, posted 01-21-2013 9:10 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 88 of 383 (688371)
01-22-2013 7:22 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by jaywill
01-21-2013 9:10 PM


Re: Authenticity?
quote:
I think the mention of the church universal is not at all untimely.
I think your idea of universal church is different that what the article presented.
Universal Church
Christian Church, the whole body of Christians collectively
Catholic Church (the word "catholic" means "universal")
Ecumenism
Unitarian Universalism
Universalism
Universal Church of the Kingdom of God
Universal Church of Truth
I feel the article I was quoting is referring to the early visible beginnings of the Catholic Church. How are you using the phrase? I think a debate over the Universal Church Theory would be off track this thread. You can ask Phat.
Pauline Epistles
These seven epistles are considered authentic by most scholars.
  • First Thessalonians (ca. 51 AD)
  • Philippians (ca. 52-54 AD)
  • Philemon (ca. 52-54 AD)
  • First Corinthians (ca. 53-54 AD)
  • Galatians (ca. 55 AD)
  • Second Corinthians (ca. 55-56 AD)
  • Romans (ca. 55-58 AD)
The Pastoral Epistles are considered to be pseudepigraphic by the majority of modern scholars.
  • First Timothy
  • Second Timothy
  • Titus
Modern scholars are divided on the following three epistles.
  • Ephesians
  • Colossians
  • Second Thessalonians
quote:
Is it more of a summary of Paul's teaching than the book of Romans ?
Is it more of a summary of Paul's teaching than First or Second Corinthians ?
I see a significant highlight of Paul's teaching presented nearly as much in Colossians or Galatians or Philippians for that matter.
The authentic letters are written to specific groups and dealing with specific issues that concern that group. Paul presents his arguments to back up his instruction. Ephesians doesn't seem to provide the in-depth arguments that Paul does. I would say the arguments for what is being said in Ephesians can be found within Paul's letters.
To see the authentic letters as summaries of Paul's teachings, one would need to know what Paul's teachings were outside of the letters. We don't have that information that I know of.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by jaywill, posted 01-21-2013 9:10 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Richh, posted 01-22-2013 11:03 AM purpledawn has seen this message but not replied
 Message 92 by jaywill, posted 01-22-2013 10:28 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 99 of 383 (688585)
01-23-2013 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by jaywill
01-23-2013 4:26 PM


Re: Authenticity AND Reliabililty
quote:
It is evident that in some cases it was important to Paul that the readers knew for certain it was his own hand writing -
"See with what large letters I have written to you with my own hand." (Galatians 6:11)
Galatians is considered authentic. First Thessalonian is considered authentic. Romans is considered authentic.
From what I've read, they don't feel this type of evidence is in Ephesians. That extra personal touch that is Paul.
Goodspeed stated in his introduction to Ephesians that the letter provides no definite historical situation that the letter is supposed to address. He feels that Paul clearly divulges under what conditions he wrote his letters and the purpose on his mind.
Another issue he has is that he feels the author presents the apostles and prophets as the foundations of the church (Ephesians 2:20), whereas Paul thought of Christ as the foundation of the church. (1 Corinthians 3:11)
Goodspeed also feels the author reveals himself to be a Greek, which Paul is not.
5. The church has become Greek; for the whole body of Christians addressed in 1:1 were once physically heathen, 2:2, 11. There is no room for any Jewish Christianity in the picture.
6. The writer himself had been in the same condition, 2:3, and hence is a gentile Christian. Paul scrupulously distinguished between the sins of the lews and the grosser ones of the heathen, Romans, chapters 1, 2. It is these grosser ones which the writer now confesses for himself and his readers. Both he and they are Greek; compare II Cor. 11:22; Gal. 2:15; Phil. 3:4.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by jaywill, posted 01-23-2013 4:26 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by jaywill, posted 01-26-2013 3:06 AM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 225 by Richh, posted 02-19-2013 11:25 PM purpledawn has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3457 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 100 of 383 (688588)
01-23-2013 6:32 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by jaywill
01-22-2013 10:28 PM


Universal Church
quote:
The building and the future of the church universal is as much a "specific issue" as in any other letter.
Christian disciples open to the apostle, maturing, reaping the benefits of his ministry would grow to have the conscerns that their spiritual leaders had. It is no anomaly that an eager audience could be draw out of Paul his deepest enthusiasm for his calling. He would share with them all that is within him to share.
I'm sorry. But I find your first rational here completely unrealistic.
Why would the ultimate future of the church NOT be a "specific issue" to the Christians under the apostle's ministry ?
You think that there was no one in the early churches who became enthusiactic about the big picture of God's overall purpose ? You think Paul had no listeners who wanted to share with him in cooperating with God for God's eternal purpose ?
I can't really respond until you clarify how you are using the phrase Universal Church as I asked in Message 88.
Edited by purpledawn, : can to can't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by jaywill, posted 01-22-2013 10:28 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by jaywill, posted 01-24-2013 6:11 PM purpledawn has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024