Did you come to the conclusion that chemotherapy is "all of 2.1 percent effective" by trusting the research in a paper which, according to you, is likely to be inaccurate? And have you decided that none of the other factors increasing the 5 year survival rate are related to science?
Life expectancy in Peru
Is none of this 20 year+ increase in life expectancy in your country due to increase in our knowledge of the physical world?
Arriba writes:
My ancestors were gold plating things with a thickness of no more than a few microns more than 3,000 years ago without doing science.
How did you date this behaviour without using science?
Arriba writes:
Coca and tobacco was cultivated and shipped round the globe at the time of the Egyptians landing in their tombs for modern-day archaeologists to find and all without science.
Since when was archaeology not a science? And how is the identity of the remnants of plants thousands of years old established without science? And could you give us a link to the source for this interesting knowledge you have acquired about ancient coco and tobacco trade? And if your source isn't a supposedly unreliable scientific research paper, what would it be?
Edited by bluegenes, : fixed link
™ Version 4.2
