Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Electron Universe/Extended periodic table
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 2 of 8 (689684)
02-02-2013 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by sunshaker
02-02-2013 11:15 AM


Your link doesn't work, please fix.
Also, please elaborate a bit on the hypothesis and describe how it relates to the creation/evolution debate.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by sunshaker, posted 02-02-2013 11:15 AM sunshaker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by sunshaker, posted 02-03-2013 9:09 AM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 4 of 8 (689712)
02-03-2013 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by sunshaker
02-03-2013 9:09 AM


Sorry, I don't get it. I need to understand what's being proposed before I can consider possibly promoting it.
What do our observations of the beginning and end of these cycles look like?
January 1, 2013 corresponds to 35Br, then January 2, 2013, corresponds to 36Kr, but January 3, 2013 skips to the next row of the periodic table, 37Rb. Does changing rows in the periodic table have any significance? Why do you start at Bromine? February 1, 2013 corresponds to 36Kr, the same as January 2, 2013 - does it have any significance when days correspond to the same element? What is the evidence connecting certain days to certain elements. Why is the connection between elements and days instead of between elements and months, or elements and years. How do you know it advances through the periodic table one element at a time instead of two? How do you know it advances across rows instead of down columns?
And I still don't see how this relates to the creation/evolution debate.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by sunshaker, posted 02-03-2013 9:09 AM sunshaker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by sunshaker, posted 02-03-2013 5:21 PM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 6 of 8 (689729)
02-04-2013 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by sunshaker
02-03-2013 5:21 PM


I cannot promote a topic when I don't know what the topic is. If that is as much as you're willing to explain then there's nothing more I can do.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by sunshaker, posted 02-03-2013 5:21 PM sunshaker has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by sunshaker, posted 02-10-2013 3:31 PM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 8 of 8 (690252)
02-11-2013 7:30 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by sunshaker
02-10-2013 3:31 PM


Hi Sunshaker,
Moderators have limited time, and reviewing topic proposals is only one of their many duties. If you're not going to treat the process seriously then you could lose your privileges in this forum, the Proposed New Topics forum.
Closing this proposal.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by sunshaker, posted 02-10-2013 3:31 PM sunshaker has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024