Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,388 Year: 3,645/9,624 Month: 516/974 Week: 129/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The God Hypothesis
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 54 of 150 (689934)
02-06-2013 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by New Cat's Eye
02-06-2013 11:06 AM


Awareness Rambling
Catholic Scientist writes:
But really, the body is what you are, and the mind is something that develops within it. Without the "you-that-is-in-your-mind", you would still function as an ape bumbling around looking for food and mates. Its only after you self-reflect, that there seems to be some problem between the "you-that-is-in-your-mind" and the body that it only superficially seems to be in control of.
That's pretty much how I've always thought about it.
Sometimes I call the "ape bumbling around looking for food and mates" to be our base intincts... things that are there, and have been there in many of our ancestors for millions of years.
Then the "you-that-is-in-your-mind" is more our intelligence. The part of us that allows reflection, and can also allow us to override our instincts (as defined above), if we are fast enough (quick minded-enough) in order to reflect upon the instinct and "catch it" before it's fully processed and the action is completed.
Perhaps there's room for some future evolution here, even.
Maybe one day, people will have a conscious mind that is actually on the same level, or even replacing their sub-conscious instinctual brain-area. This would greatly help in the control of things like fear and acting in anger/passion.
Likely, some people's consciousness is stronger/faster at controlling these instinctual abilities right now. Not only does it seem somewhat genetic, but it's also an ability that can be improved upon and we can learn to be better at it with training. Can we be taught it completely if it wasn't there in the first place? I don't know...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by New Cat's Eye, posted 02-06-2013 11:06 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by 1.61803, posted 02-07-2013 11:59 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 147 of 150 (693198)
03-12-2013 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by onifre
03-11-2013 6:44 PM


Baloney
Apparently, these are the 7 major senses:
Sight
Smell
Touch
Taste
Hearing
Intuition
Equilibrium
But I don't think the last two are really accepted by anyone who isn't into some weird, imaginative stuff.
Any academic system seems to list the "major" senses as the ordinary 5 we all know and love.
I did see this, though. But again, it's not exactly scholarly:
Answers from teh interwebs writes:
More recently, scientists categorize the senses into two major groups. One group is the special senses, which are produced by highly localized sensory organs and include the senses of smell, taste, sight, hearing, and balance. The other group is the general senses, which are more widely distributed throughout the body and include such senses as touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and vibration.
Answers.com: What are the major senses?
That would make 10 senses. But a lot of them seem to me like they can be jammed under "touch."
Maybe they've been split because of different organs/systems in the body doing the sensing? I don't know enough about human anatomy to continue.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by onifre, posted 03-11-2013 6:44 PM onifre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by kofh2u, posted 03-16-2013 3:34 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024