Lack of random environments

The cat's question is: does that mean that the three-headed monster critters are just lacking a proper environment to adapt to and to be fit in? Could there are be an environment they are the fittest for? It must be so if there is no intrinsic damage or benefit brought by a mutation but the selecting environment alone decides who is fit and who is not.

I would concur that indeed it does seem remarkable. The observations that we see are virtually organisms getting exactly what they need to survive better, when they need it.

It mirrors the smaller adaptions we see all around us, like the ability to tan, the occurrence of blisters when our skin needs more protection, muscles that grow stronger when we need them to do hard work, lungs that getting better at breathing when we need to run longer.

This is another one those things that evolutionists like to say, without ever being called on it, or thinking about the reasonableness of this presumption. As if evolution started with a simple organism, then kept building upon it, and yet no new simple organisms started again, and again?How come 5000 years ago another simple celled creature didn't start evolving to become more complex, with another entirely different foundation. And how about 100 years ago? Or 25 years ago? Was is your theory only something that has happened in the past.

Its another black mark against the many your theory can't overcome.

The observations that we see are virtually organisms getting exactly what they need to survive better, when they need it.