Lack of random environments

This is another one those things that evolutionists like to say, without ever being called on it, or thinking about the reasonableness of this presumption. As if evolution started with a simple organism, then kept building upon it, and yet no new simple organisms started again, and again?How come 5000 years ago another simple celled creature didn't start evolving to become more complex, with another entirely different foundation. And how about 100 years ago? Or 25 years ago? Was is your theory only something that has happened in the past.Its another black mark against the many your theory can't overcome.

I would concur that indeed it does seem remarkable. The observations that we see are virtually organisms getting exactly what they need to survive better, when they need it. It mirrors the smaller adaptions we see all around us, like the ability to tan, the occurrence of blisters when our skin needs more protection, muscles that grow stronger when we need them to do hard work, lungs that getting better at breathing when we need to run longer. Life is full of things that do what they need to to become better on so many levels.Random mistakes hardly seems an adequate explanation for this being so.