Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A personal morality
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 196 (393120)
04-03-2007 3:30 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by kuresu
04-02-2007 9:14 PM


if you seriously, honestly believe that something is wrong or right, why would you change your behavior if you eliminate the "objective" part of morality? this makes no sense to me (that you would, that is).
To reap the reward of the immoral behavior.
if you feel that it is wrong to steal, why would you steal?
For the money.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by kuresu, posted 04-02-2007 9:14 PM kuresu has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 196 (393124)
04-03-2007 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by kuresu
04-02-2007 11:36 PM


Re: you are correct...
an objective morality would be free of bias, would be free of life experiences, there would be a single definition of "right" and "wrong" as well as what is "right" and "wrong".
It could exist without us being able to define everything, or even be totally aware of its existance.
God could have an objective morality laid out. We just don't have access to all the definitions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by kuresu, posted 04-02-2007 11:36 PM kuresu has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 196 (393716)
04-06-2007 2:58 PM


Talkin' 'bout my morality...
There are behaviors that my conscience tells me are immoral that I enjoy doing. I try to avoid these behaviors for some of the following reasons:
  • The affects they have on other people.
  • The affects they have on me.
  • The affects they have on God.
Sometimes I avoid the behaviors for all three reasons sometimes for just one.
If I lost my faith and became atheist, the immoral behaviors that I avoid because of their affects on God alone would have no reason to be avoided anymore.
If I became an atheist, I would behave more immorally.

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by jar, posted 04-06-2007 5:31 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 124 by Trae, posted 04-06-2007 9:22 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 126 by fallacycop, posted 04-06-2007 10:13 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 127 by Max Power, posted 04-07-2007 12:16 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 129 by Neutralmind, posted 04-08-2007 11:15 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 196 (393718)
04-06-2007 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Stile
04-06-2007 12:14 PM


Hi Stile,
I never got a chance to reply to your last message to me in the Athiesm Examined thread. Do you want me to write one and slap it up somewhere or just forget about it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Stile, posted 04-06-2007 12:14 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Stile, posted 04-06-2007 6:14 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 141 of 196 (394023)
04-09-2007 10:08 AM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
jar writes:
Can you give me an example of something that you can do which would effect GOD?
Well, I don’t think that I can really effect GOD, but I think that some of the things I do can effect Him within me. You know, the whole “my body is a temple” thingy. So, something like drunkenness could have an effect on god, through me, but I don’t think that little ol’ me is really having much of an effect on GOD. Still though, my conscience tells me that heavy intoxication is hurting god too.
So if we take god out of the picture, there is one less reason for me to avoid drunkenness, and I think it would happen more often and I would be more immoral. Assuming that drunkenness is immoral.
Other things that could effect god: idolatry and blasphemy.
But doing those as an atheist wouldn’t really make me more immoral.
Some other people responded with replies that echo the previous line. The things that are immoral only because of their effects on god should no longer be immoral if you’re an atheist.
In order for the immorality to increase after becoming atheist, the acts would have to effect more than just god.
I also have to admit that the threat of punishment persuades me to avoid punishable behaviors. Removing god as one of the sources of punishment will lead to me behaving more immorally.

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by jar, posted 04-09-2007 10:41 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 143 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 12:05 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 144 of 196 (394043)
04-09-2007 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by jar
04-09-2007 10:41 AM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
I'm sorry but what you posted seems totally contradictory and just play with words
Yeah, it probably is.
You say in the same paragraph that you can not affect God and that you are affecting God.
The difference is between god and GOD.
I don't think that I can really effect the almighty GOD, but that my actions have an affect on god, as he is in me.
I'll leave it at that. I don't care to get down to the gnat's ass with it.
It seems that the heart of the argument from the theists like yourself is that you believe you are incapable of responsible behavior unless such behavior is coerced.
Yeah, basically. But I wouldn't say incapable, its more like umwilling.
Take god out of this world and.... fuck it, let's party.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by jar, posted 04-09-2007 10:41 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by nator, posted 04-09-2007 1:04 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 145 of 196 (394046)
04-09-2007 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Stile
04-09-2007 12:05 PM


Re: Effects on God
can you identify some sort of relationship/feeling/thing with God that you think you have that I do not have with myself, my loved ones, and those I respect?
No, not really.
If you cannot identify it, then without God you lose nothing
Its not so much about losing something. Its about gaining. I'd gain the freedom to do all the bad things that I would enjoy doing without the threat of punishment. I could just go hog wild, and I just might.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 12:05 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 1:05 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 148 of 196 (394059)
04-09-2007 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by nator
04-09-2007 1:04 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
If you really, truly believe that the only reason you wouldn't behave immorally and hurt other people is through fear of punishment from God, then that is a truly frightening thought.
The fear of punishment from God is not the only reason I wouldn't behave immorally and hurt other people. But, it is one of the reasons. If you remove God, then I have one less reason to NOT behave immorally and would be more inclined to do so.
It means that you are basically amoral at heart, without a conscience.
That makes you pretty much a sociopath.
Well, then its a good thing I believe in God, eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by nator, posted 04-09-2007 1:04 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 1:39 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 150 of 196 (394062)
04-09-2007 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Stile
04-09-2007 1:05 PM


Re: Effects on God
However, this fear of punishment is very low on the why-I-do-good-things meter when compared to the "because it's the right thing to do" motive.
"Because its the right thing to do" is not the largest reason for why I do good things. Its in there, but a little extra incentive helps in getting the right thing done.
Its easy for someone to say they do the right thing only because its the right thing when they ain't doin' shit. Or when they're deluding themselves because they can't admit they do the right things for selfish reasons.
I suppose people will say that that makes me a bad person. Without God, so what? Fuck 'em. Survival of the fittest. Might makes right. What are you do with the "bad people"? (<--- that)
However, if this fear is high on anyone's why-they-do-good-things meter, I would argue that they have deeper problems to worry about.
These "deeper problems" really have little effect on my day-to-day life. I'm not that worried about them.
That is, if you don't have any positive reason to do good things, and you are only afraid of a threat of punishment... I would argue that you're really not a very good person to begin with.
Believe me, to begin with, I am not a very good person. But in the end, after it all, I find that I am a good person, thank God.
To me, a fear of punishment is a very immature, and low-level motive for doing good things.
Tell me, have you ever held a management position? Ever tried to get employees to be good workers without a fear of punishment? Positive reinforcement can work a little, but when it comes down to it, sometimes you gotta bust out the whip
but the fact that no one's ever come back from being dead to describe and show us what really happens adds a certain amount of "anything's possible".So I do have a very minor threat of eternal punishment, but I would say it's incredibly low on my why-I-do-good-things meter. Perhaps even the very bottom.
That's good for you. If it makes you all warm inside to do the right thing just because it is the right thing, then more power to you.
One could also argue, though, that you're doing the right thing NOT because it is the right thing but because it makes you feel good. Perhaps a selfish reason.
But what if you just don't care? Or what if you don't feel anything extra from doing the right thing? The threat of punishment should put you on the straight and narrow, no?
I don't know why I'm feeling so hostile today, maybe I woke up on the wrong side of the bed

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 1:05 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 2:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 163 by nator, posted 04-09-2007 3:25 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 196 (394064)
04-09-2007 1:53 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by crashfrog
04-09-2007 1:39 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
That doesn't make any sense. If your other reasons are sufficient, then they don't get less sufficient just because one reason has been removed.
For some things, the other reasons are NOT sufficient, I'm sorta teetering on the edge. With God I don't fall, but without him I would.
I don't really want to expose myself by getting into specific behaviors, if you don't mind.
I agree with you for most things, that taking god out really wouldn't have an effect. But there are things, for me, that it would. I would be less moral if I didn't believe in God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 1:39 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 2:01 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 154 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 2:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 196 (394066)
04-09-2007 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by crashfrog
04-09-2007 2:01 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
If we're talking about things that are only immoral because it's your belief God says they are, then if you stopped believing in God, why would doing those things still be immoral?
We're talking typing about things that my conscience says are immoral but I would enjoy doing anyways. Sometimes its fun to be bad. When confronted with the option to just do the bad thing anyways, sometimes I think about God and then NOT do them. If I didn't stop to think about God then I'd just go with it and have fun being bad.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 2:01 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 3:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 170 by crashfrog, posted 04-09-2007 7:34 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 196 (394069)
04-09-2007 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by ringo
04-09-2007 2:10 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
As long as you're being "good" out of fear of punishment, you're really not being moral at all. You're just faking it, going through the motions.
Well, then for some of the morally correct things that I do, I am just faking it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 2:10 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 2:33 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 157 of 196 (394076)
04-09-2007 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by ringo
04-09-2007 2:33 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
So, do you think your fake morality is fooling God?
If god says "Don't lie or I'll kick your ass" and the only reason I'm not lying is to avoid the ass kicking, then what is it that I'm faking?
If you're afraid of punishment, shouldn't there be more punishment for being dishonest?
How am I being dishonest (in the above situation)?
Now, if God says "always tell the truth because it is the right thing to do, and if you don't then I will kick your ass" and I'm only telling the truth to avoid the ass kicking, then No, I wouldn't think that I would be fooling God. And no, I don't think there should be more punishment than for the liars.
Now, most of God's commands were "Thou Shall Not's", not "Thou Shall's".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 2:33 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by nator, posted 04-09-2007 3:19 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 162 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 3:23 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 160 of 196 (394081)
04-09-2007 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by Stile
04-09-2007 2:51 PM


Re: Effects on God
. The threat of punishment is an effective moral motive. I just see it as an immature, and low-level one. With "because it's the right thing to do" or "because I want to help others" being much more mature and advanced motives. I would even put "for selfish how-it-makes-me-feel" reasons above fear of punishment (but not above the other two I just mentioned).
I agree.
You won't see me sitting on a moral high horse.
I need the threat of punishment as an incentive to avoid the immoral behaviors that I would enjoy doing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 2:51 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 3:34 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 164 of 196 (394085)
04-09-2007 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by Stile
04-09-2007 3:10 PM


Re: Talkin' 'bout my morality...
Would thinking about your loved ones, or yourself even, not prevent you from doing the bad thing?
For some things it would and for some it wouldn't.
Answer Yes (I don't think you're really worried about this one): Then your normal "non-God related" morals are sufficient for you to restrain yourself. And therefore, you are not losing any sense of morality. More... cleaning it up and making it more efficient. Sort of... more succinctly defining what's actually driving your morals.
What about something of questionable morallity that the non-God related morality is not sufficient, where the God-related morality is neccessary. People would probably argue that these things are not immoral, but that is not what my conscience is saying. Of course, I could just be brainwashed but I think I've wiped the slate clean and doubt it.
No "A": You are not worried about any affects on your loved ones/yourself because no one's getting hurt, or no one's being negatively impacted in any physical or mentally abusive way.
-Like crash mentioned. Who cares, then? Maybe it really isn't immoral to do this thing in the first place.
The point is that my conscience has labeled some behaviors as immoral, a priori.
The idea that if nobody is getting hurt then its okay does not sit well with me. Especially when it effects my realtionship with God.
No "B": You are not worried about any affects on your loved ones/yourself even though they are getting hurt either mentally or physically in some way.
It would be easier for me to accept the above if I was an atheist. If there are some behaviors that hurt others that I don't care about, the last chance for me to not do it is with God.
-Like Nator and I mentioned. You are probably not a very nice person.
Lets assume I'm not. So what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 3:10 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Stile, posted 04-09-2007 4:16 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 168 by ringo, posted 04-09-2007 4:37 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024