Yes, Desmond Morris has written quite a bit about the monkey-human shift in traits signally sexual attractiveness. It also has much do with 'frontal' signaling as opposed to 'rear end' signalling accompanying the change in position of sex to a face-to-face orientation. It bears noting that what remains consistent is the clear association of sexual attractiveness traits with features directly indicative of female reproductive fertility.
Human males still find all the following female features attractive.
1. body shape (related to actual child-bearing ability).
2. breasts (related to child-nurturing ability, even if representing tranposed buttocks).
3. hair and skin textures and coloration (signals of overal health).
4. general indicators of youthfulness (directly correlated with potential future reproductive effort.
These correlations have a lot to do with why we find these features attractive, but we don't *decide* to find them attractive because of the correlations. Rather, the correlations of these features with actual female fitness over thousands of generation have caused preferences for these features to become relatively fixed tendencies in the human population. No conscious decisions are required - we just 'feel' that way.