Summations Only

No, there is no such insinuation there.

It says that RW is leaving plain atheism, in favor of A+, and that she hopes (perhaps encourages) others of like mind to join her.

So what?She neither says, nor implies, that only misogynists and racists will remain.

She used a common idiom, which does not have the implications that you are claiming.

Yes, exactly right.I keep seeing atheist meetings being pushed on some of the blogs. And I can't imagine why I would ever want to attend one. I suppose there is slightly more content to a skeptics meeting, though I can't imagine why I would want to attend one of those either.

Rebecca Watson made a comment about an incident that happened to her, and which has come to be known as "elevator guy".PZ Myers thought this mentioning on his blog.No big deal in either case. It was just a point that they thought mentioning. And they did not make a big deal of it.But then large numbers of people came out of the woodwork, and did make a big deal of it. They were very angry at Watson for even mentioning the incident, and angry at PZ for mentioning it on his blog.This should have been a minor issue. Many people made a big deal out of it. That is what suggested that there is a problem.

I respect her right to free speech, which she exercises on her blog.However, I am not a regular reader of her blog. I have better ways to spend my time.Still, nothing justifies the reaction to her post and youtube video. If people think "elevator guy incident" was no big deal (and I'm inclined to agree with that), shouldn't they also think that RW's reaction was also no big deal?