Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,876 Year: 4,133/9,624 Month: 1,004/974 Week: 331/286 Day: 52/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fountains of the deep, new evidence
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 31 of 106 (736255)
09-06-2014 4:11 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Colbard
09-05-2014 9:33 PM


Re: Water in the earth
quote:
Ref google "iron deposits meteor crater Arizona"
I did. They assumed that there would be iron from the meteor there, but found none. So where are these "iron seams" of yours?
The mining of the crater continued until 1929 without ever finding the ten-million ton meteorite that Barringer assumed must be hidden. At this time the astronomer Forest Ray Moulton performed calculations on the energy expended by the meteorite on impact, and concluded that the meteorite had most likely vaporized when it landed. By this point Barringer had spent over $600,000 in mining the crater, nearly bankrupting him, with no iron profits to show for it.
Daniel Barringer
Perhaps you would also like to explain why the results of googling the terms you suggested find results completely contrary to your claims?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Colbard, posted 09-05-2014 9:33 PM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 5:15 AM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 33 of 106 (736257)
09-06-2014 5:22 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Colbard
09-06-2014 5:15 AM


Re: Water in the earth
quote:
The iron seams are up to 14 km away from the blast zone, but they are not from outer space. My guess it that they will be on the eastern side of the crater.
Can you support that with an actual reference and not telling people to do a google search?
And can you explain just how these iron seams are supposedly formed?
quote:
It's interesting how they cannot find the supposed meteor, and propose it evaporated on impact.
It's interesting that your idea of giving a reference is telling people to do a google search - which doesn't find anything to support your claims.
But if the meteorite should have vapourised - as the calculations indicated - then it is hardly surprising that it wasn't found.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 5:15 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 5:50 AM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 35 of 106 (736260)
09-06-2014 6:09 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Colbard
09-06-2014 5:50 AM


Re: Water in the earth
In other words you have no supporting references, at all. Of course, without any reason to expect iron seams to be produced by your mechanism the actual presence of iron is a moot point. And you haven't even tried to support that claim.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 5:50 AM Colbard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Colbard, posted 09-06-2014 8:56 AM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024