Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9024 total)
61 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, frako, jar, kjsimons, PaulK, Taq (7 members, 54 visitors)
Newest Member: Ryan Merkle
Post Volume: Total: 882,898 Year: 544/14,102 Month: 544/294 Week: 31/269 Day: 11/20 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?
jar
Member
Posts: 33125
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 121 of 143 (809048)
05-15-2017 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Tangle
05-15-2017 3:51 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
You missed the news about Planxit...

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Tangle, posted 05-15-2017 3:51 PM Tangle has not yet responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 18854
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 122 of 143 (809142)
05-16-2017 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by goldenlightArchangel
05-15-2017 2:56 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
celestialGyoud writes:

. bring up your list of problems that evolutionary theory has failed to solve . .


Problems that a theory can not solve YET are not a reason to call a theory obsolete.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-15-2017 2:56 PM goldenlightArchangel has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM ringo has responded

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member
Posts: 581
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 123 of 143 (809176)
05-16-2017 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by ringo
05-16-2017 12:07 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
There are four different reasons why your theory becomes obsolete,

and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.

Actually the reason why Evolutionary theory in regards to Human origins is not declared obsolete is because money speaks louder than Math.

Edited by celestialGyoud, : update


This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by ringo, posted 05-16-2017 12:07 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by Tanypteryx, posted 05-16-2017 5:18 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 125 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-16-2017 5:26 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 126 by Taq, posted 05-16-2017 5:26 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 127 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2017 12:35 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 128 by ringo, posted 05-17-2017 3:10 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 2416
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 124 of 143 (809178)
05-16-2017 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
Actually the reason why Evolutionary theory in regards to Human origins is not declared obsolete is because money speaks louder than Math.

Yep, every time they tried to declare it obsolete I ponied up $25 to keep it afloat.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 125 of 143 (809180)
05-16-2017 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.

What growth rate are you falsely assuming for the human population over that period, and why are you ignoring the fact that it's known to be wrong?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 8466
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 6.3


Message 126 of 143 (809181)
05-16-2017 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
celestialGyoud writes:

There are four different reasons why your theory becomes obsolete,
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.

The theory of evolution is not obsolete because it figured out a long time ago that birth rates and infant mortality for humans were quite different in the past.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 157 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 127 of 143 (809201)
05-17-2017 12:35 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


your math argument is just as invalid as 4 years ago
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.

As I've told you before CrazyDiamond7 (see Message 35), math cannot change reality, so if your math calculations result in something that doesn't match reality it is your math that is at fault. Usually a missed assumption.

Curiously it was the fact that animal populations did not increase to massive numbers (Malthusian formulas apply to all living species) is what gave both Darwin and Wallace the inspiration for natural selection eliminating those less adapted to their ecologies.

And, humans seem particularly well adapted to culling their own populations with on going wars ...

So you argument is invalid, because it ain't real. It was invalid 4 years ago, and time has not changed that.

Enjoy

Edited by RAZD, : .


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 18854
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.8


(1)
Message 128 of 143 (809265)
05-17-2017 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel
05-16-2017 5:09 PM


Re: ULTIMATE LIST of Problems that Evolutionary theory has failed to solve
celestialGyoud writes:

... if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.


You don't need global exterminations to limit population growth. All you need is a death rate near the birth rate. Unless you know what the birth and death rates were on a day-to-day basis in the past, your calculation is just garbage in, garbage out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-16-2017 5:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member
Posts: 581
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 129 of 143 (883727)
01-09-2021 1:18 AM


looking for the multiplication rate proposed by Evolutionary theory
.
.

What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying?

With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.

Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe.

.


Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by PaulK, posted 01-09-2021 1:34 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 131 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 01-09-2021 5:11 PM goldenlightArchangel has responded
 Message 135 by frako, posted 01-09-2021 11:42 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 16684
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.9


Message 130 of 143 (883728)
01-09-2021 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel
01-09-2021 1:18 AM


Re: looking for the multiplication rate proposed by Evolutionary theory
quote:
What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying?

-100%. Yes, I do mean a negative growth rate. Extinction is a possibility, and that IS extinction.

quote:
With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.

I look forward to seeing your proof. I hope that you will provide documented figures on carrying capacity of the land given the lifestyles of the people.

quote:
Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe.

Since biology does not deal much with language formation or cultural divisions I would not expect it to. You would have to go beyond biology for that.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 1:18 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member
Posts: 590
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 6.6


(3)
Message 131 of 143 (883744)
01-09-2021 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel
01-09-2021 1:18 AM


Re: looking for the multiplication rate proposed by Evolutionary theory
With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million.

In Northern British Columbia there is a pine forest.
In the middle of that pine forest there is a pine tree.
That pine tree has 100 branches.
Each of those branches has 100 pine cones.
Each of those pine cones has 100 seeds.
Every few years the scales of those cones open and release their 1,000,000 seeds into the wind.
The population of pine trees is stable. It does not grow by a factor of 1,000,000 every few years.

Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe.

It is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain why planets move in elliptical orbits (but they do).
It is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain how an electrical charge difference can cause lightning (but it does).
It is impossible that evolutionary theory can prove that goldelightArchangel was home schooled (but he obviously was).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 1:18 AM goldenlightArchangel has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 7:18 PM AnswersInGenitals has not yet responded

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member
Posts: 581
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 132 of 143 (883750)
01-09-2021 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by AnswersInGenitals
01-09-2021 5:11 PM


The human origins theory did not explain this
.

The fact is that evolutionary theory named human origins is entitled to explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 01-09-2021 5:11 PM AnswersInGenitals has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by AZPaul3, posted 01-09-2021 9:32 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 134 by frako, posted 01-09-2021 11:35 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 136 by PaulK, posted 01-10-2021 2:00 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded
 Message 142 by ringo, posted 01-11-2021 11:26 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5536
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 6.1


Message 133 of 143 (883752)
01-09-2021 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by goldenlightArchangel
01-09-2021 7:18 PM


Re: The human origins theory did not explain this
No it isn't you idiot.

Factio Republicana delenda est.
I am antifa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 7:18 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 01-10-2021 2:58 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
frako
Member
Posts: 2931
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 134 of 143 (883753)
01-09-2021 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by goldenlightArchangel
01-09-2021 7:18 PM


Re: The human origins theory did not explain this
42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe.

You do know that all languages are related.

Afrikaans: “Moeder” or “Ma
Albanian: “Nene” or “Meme”
Arabic: “Ahm”
Belarusan: “Matka”
Bosnian: “Majka”
Brazilian: “Mae”
Bulgarian: “Majka
Catalan: “Mare”
Croatian: “Mati” or “Majka”
Czech: “Maminka”
Danish: “Mor”
Dutch: “Moeder” or “Moer”
Estonian: “Ema”
Filipino: “Ina”
Finnish: “Aiti”
French: “Mere” or “Maman”
German: “Mutter”
Greek: “Mana” or “Mitera”
Haitian Creole: “Manman”
Hawaiian: “Makuahine”
Hindi: “Ma” or “Maji”
Hungarian: “Anya” or “Fu”
Icelandic: “Mamma”
Indonesian: “Induk,” “Ibu,” “Biang” or “Nyokap”
Irish: “Mathair”
Italian: “Madre” or “Mamma”
Japanese: “Okaasan” or “Haha”
Latin: “Mater”
Latvian: “Mamma”
Lithuanian: “Motina”
Malay: “Ibu”
Norwegian: “Mamma” or “Mor”
Persian: “Madr” or “Maman”
Polish: “Matka” or “Mama”
Portuguese: “Mae”
Punjabi: “Mai,” “Mataji” or “Pabbo”
Romanian: “Mama” or “Maica”
Russian: “Mama”
Samoan: “Tina”
Serbian: “Majka”
Slovak: “Mama” or “Matka”
Spanish: “Madre,” “Mama” or “Mami”
Swahili: “Mama,” “Mzazi” or “Mzaa”
Swedish: “Mamma,” “Mor” or “Morsa”
Turkish: “Anne,” “Ana” or “Valide”
Ukrainian: “Mati”
Urdu: “Ammee”
Vietnamese: “Me”
Welsh: “Mam”
Yiddish: “Muter”


Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand

What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 7:18 PM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by dwise1, posted 01-10-2021 4:27 PM frako has not yet responded

  
frako
Member
Posts: 2931
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 135 of 143 (883754)
01-09-2021 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel
01-09-2021 1:18 AM


Re: looking for the multiplication rate proposed by Evolutionary theory
What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying?

why do they need to keep on growing. Couldn't the number stay relatively the same because do to their lack of technology and knowledge they couldn't grow enough food for more. Or the lack of sanitation would just kill them off via illness if a settlement got to big?

Edited by frako, : No reason given.


Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand

What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 01-09-2021 1:18 AM goldenlightArchangel has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021