Hollow Earth Expedition?

Yes, this is true that the force of gravity at the center of a sphere is zero, but how does the fact that there is no gravity at the center eliminate the possibility of having a void at the center? What scenario are you thinking of wherein having non-zero gravity would help support a void? None of the people on this site who I know to be engineers are YEC's. I am certainly not a YEC proponent. Would this make sense even if the Earth were hollow? Peter Lamont, are you out there?

I guessed a different submarine movie, but I wanted to point out that you missed out on the atta-boy by not giving the character names, Marko Ramius and Jack Ryan as required, and now it's too late.

Definitely worth an atta-boy. Nine more and you are even for the night!

I'm still miffed that the answer isn't Ice Station Zebra. No, I'm standing by my nit picking. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

For completeness sake:Jeffrey Pelt:"Mr. Ambassador, you have nearly a hundred naval vessels operating in the North Atlantic right now. Your aircraft has dropped enough sonar buoys so that a man could walk from Greenland to Iceland to Scotland without getting his feet wet. Now, shall we dispense with the bull?"Ambassador Lysenko: "You make your point as delicately as ever, Mr. Pelt."

Are we supposed to be taking this stuff seriously? Are you actually suggesting that there really might be an entry point to the inside of the Earth located at the north pole? That the center of gravity of the earth might not be about 6400 km straight down from here?Or more fundamentally, do you believe you've presented something that anyone ought to spend real effort refuting? Because the proposals in this thread haven't even reached 'Chariot of the Gods' level of seriousness.

How about some example verses?

Before I engage the supposed examples you provided, I have to complain about the bait and switch. Here is the previous discussion and my request for example verses. Your examples don't touch on any of the stuff you promised.Now about the particular bit of science you offered. This is hardly any science here. Instead there is a questionable bit of interpretation that would intended to correct other Bible interpretations. And then what about the third day stuff which regardless of whether the earth was present at the beginning, places the creation of the earth prior to the creation of the sun, moon, and stars on Day 4. Your statement here is nonsense. Nothing in the first few chapters of Genesis either requires or rejects a hollow earth.As usual, claims that the Bible is a scientific text book turn out to be akin to numerology.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Yes I do need you to provide the info you promised. You haven't connected the dots to a single one of your claims of scientific knowledge in the Bible. You say that Job tells us what is inside the earth. So tell us what, according to Job is actually inside the earth.

Those books are not gibberish in my opinion. But they aren't science texts and don't intend to be. They would appear to be less scientific that you for example.When Shakespeare wrote about taking arms against a sea of troubles, he was not talking about trying to cut the ocean with a sword. And yet he was not writing gibberish either.

That technique does not seem to have worked for you. So far you are unable to tell us any of the answers you received when your thinking was opened up.

Yes, I know why. You are a fraud.

I had hopes that a few questions would cause you to focus your thinking. But you are too weak to respond to any opposition to your idea. I wonder what reason such a person would have to visit a debate site?Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Yes I was curious. I am curious about you, what you think, and why. I am curious as to whether you can rationally explain what you think.However my curiosity is greatly diminished after a few non answers. You are unable or unwilling to show us how the Bible describes the interior of the earth.

Don't bother.