Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   -Moral Standard In All of Humanity-
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 72 (378444)
01-20-2007 6:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by joshua221
01-20-2007 3:58 PM


on standards of right and wrong
There exists what is truly and absolutely right and we can discern what that is, there is a standard and the standard is what is perfectly right and good.
So you assert.
But where is this absolute standard?
How does everyone discern that standard?
If we were unable to know what was right and good then there would be little reason for us to exist as we could not live a good life or even know what that entails, everything dealing with morality and conscience would be a subjective absurdity.
What does that have to do with anything? Why could we not live a good life? Morality is subjective and constantly changing.
Without this "standard" so to speak, the choice between right and wrong would be subjective. So any action from murder to theft would be acceptable in this world. Nothing would matter.
How utterly wrong can you get. If society says murder is wrong, then it is wrong. If society says theft is unacceptable, then it is unacceptable.
It really is as simple as that.
We know that such a model or standard exists because we trust that God did not create some sort of silly and simple-minded game for humans to take part in.
Nonsense. Totally unrelated and irrelevant nonsense.
First, we may believe there is a God but we do not know that.
Second, if God exists God could very well be Loki.
Third there is NO reason for any such standards. What is right and moral in one era, one milieu may well be immoral in another.
Edited by jar, : goo +d

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by joshua221, posted 01-20-2007 3:58 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by nator, posted 01-20-2007 7:10 PM jar has not replied
 Message 11 by joshua221, posted 01-20-2007 7:46 PM jar has replied
 Message 33 by Phat, posted 01-21-2007 2:59 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 13 of 72 (378476)
01-20-2007 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by joshua221
01-20-2007 7:46 PM


Re: on standards of right and wrong
So, it is "right" to murder and to steal in a society which accepts or promotes these actions as right and good actions?
Yes. It most certainly is. Read the Bible.
But I still used the line "trust the God isn't playing some sort of game" just to really throw you off and make you realize that absolute human morality exists.
Well, you failed.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by joshua221, posted 01-20-2007 7:46 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by joshua221, posted 01-21-2007 12:01 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 40 of 72 (378577)
01-21-2007 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by joshua221
01-21-2007 12:01 AM


Re: on standards of right and wrong
Have you given up at the question?
What? You asked a simple yes or no question and I answered the simple yes or no question.
I would like to see some evidence perhaps as to why it is acceptable besides "it most certainly is", otherwise it looks as if I have stumped you.
Stumped? In your dreams perhaps.
Read the Bible. God commands folk to go out and kill and pillage. Those that do not follow Gods commandment are punished.
In that society, to not kill and steal was immoral.
You see, there really is a "standard" that exists. We can all see it and decide what is righteous. To deny it's existence is to deny the existence of morality altogether.
So you continue to assert even when presented with evidence that refutes your position.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by joshua221, posted 01-21-2007 12:01 AM joshua221 has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 41 of 72 (378579)
01-21-2007 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Phat
01-21-2007 2:59 AM


Re: on standards of right and wrong
Ah the old shell game again. Why do you folk just regurgitate the Chick Tract arguments without thinking them through?
Can I get independent confirmation of how my parents felt about me?
Can I get independent confirmation of your existence?
Can I even get someone who doesn't believe that you exist (for example the robot crawlers from Google that index the web) to verify the same evidence I have that you exist?
Can I get independent confirmation of God's existence?
Can I even get someone who doesn't believe that God exists (for example the robot crawlers from Google that index the web) to verify the existence of God?
Stop and think. Don't just accept the really stupid examples that the Fundies throw out as facT.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Phat, posted 01-21-2007 2:59 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Phat, posted 01-22-2007 12:31 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 50 of 72 (378894)
01-22-2007 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Phat
01-22-2007 12:31 AM


Don't check your brain at the door.
Who specifically is "you folk"? Do you see no individuality in the context of what I say versus what you have read from others? Chick Tracts are not a primary source of reference for me.
No, not much. When you bring up silly old arguments like this one it only tells me you have not thought the issue through.
Now if you reread the answers to the questions I asked you will see that you agree that it is possible to get independent confirmation of all the issues you raised.
When I asked though "Can I get independent confirmation of God's existence?", you simply started playing the old shell game. You replied:
Independent of what?
That is the classic response I would expect for those raised in the Non-Thinking Christian Churches, the Cult of Ignorance Churches. I doubt that you even noticed what you were doing.
Look again at the questions I asked. They were in the exact same format as the last question. You had no problem understanding the word "independent" in any of the prior questions, but when I place God in the sentence you shut your brain down.
Does the question makes you uncomfortable?
Why don't you want to ask if you can get independent confirmation of God's existence?
Why do you want to insist on claiming you "Know" something that you only believe?
This might at first seem off topic, however it goes directly back to the question. Folk claim they Know God and so they Know some Moral Standard exists.
Well, they are all wrong. They are as wrong as if they claimed 2 + 2 = 5.
They are wrong NOT because the answers are difficult but because they refuse to even ask the Questions.
Edited by jar, : fix subtitle

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Phat, posted 01-22-2007 12:31 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Phat, posted 01-22-2007 11:52 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 52 of 72 (378917)
01-22-2007 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Phat
01-22-2007 11:52 AM


Re: Don't check your brain at the door.
Read what you actually write.
Because my relationship with God is quite personal. This I know. Or I believe.
Huh? You know or you believe? What does that have to do with what I asked? Knowing that your relationship with someone is personal is entirely different than knowing that the person exists.
I know that my relationship with my mother was very personal. That would be true regardless of whether or not she really existed.
I can though "Know" that my mother existed. There are several reasons.
  • at the time I was born the probability of being born other than from a woman was near zero.
  • I have photographs of my mother that others can see and examine.
  • I can check with others who also met my mother.
While there is always the possibility that the person claiming to be my mother was NOT actually my mother, I could through DNA testing verify even that.
But no such tests can be performed on GOD.
I believe that I experienced a profound change when I got saved. I then think (or believe) but do not know that I can recognize God-morality better than I could before.
Again covering all bases? You believe? Or do you know?
God-morality? What is that? Is it sold by the pound, the liter, the gallon? Is it measured in feet or inches?
I could be delusional, however!
Or wrong. Or confusing some internal musings with an external reality, or only understand part of what happened. There are many possible explanations.
But what does "when I got saved" mean? Are you saved? Saved from what? How exactly have you been changed?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Phat, posted 01-22-2007 11:52 AM Phat has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 59 of 72 (379576)
01-24-2007 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by joshua221
01-24-2007 3:30 PM


Why?
The point of this thread is that for one to think, and think of things that matter in life, one must accept the existence of these absolutes and seek to define them.
Why?
Why limit yourself to simply the Absolute?
I doubt you have ever really been in nature but I can tell you from experience that it is an something one never forgets.
Take a few weeks off and hike part of the Appalachian Trail.
When you actually get into a forest (and most Americans have never been there) ABSOLUTE is about 10 yards in front of you, about three yards on each side.
Absolute is the next step, how to get around THIS fall, am I still on the trail?
In the end though it does come down to doing.
Thinking about hiking the AT is not hiking the AT.
The cliche is to "seek the truth", but that is exactly what thinkers do, what philosophers do. This is philosophy.
Thinkers are okay, but they are pretty much useless. It is fine to think about hiking the Trail, or think about Justice, but in the end it comes down as always to doing.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 3:30 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-24-2007 6:24 PM jar has replied
 Message 62 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 7:43 PM jar has replied
 Message 63 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 7:44 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 61 of 72 (379580)
01-24-2007 6:33 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Archer Opteryx
01-24-2007 6:24 PM


Re: Why?
Does AT here stand for 'Appalachian Trail' or 'Absolute Truth'?
Odds are you can actually make progress on the 'Appalachian Trail' while 'Absolute Truth' will forever remain a myth and fantasy.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-24-2007 6:24 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 64 of 72 (379599)
01-24-2007 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by joshua221
01-24-2007 7:43 PM


Re: Why?
But so far everyone has told me that hiking the AT is impossible, that human beings cannot know what is truly true.
You yourself have.
"Truly True?" What the hell does that mean?
And where has ANYONE made such a silly statement?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 7:43 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 8:30 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 67 of 72 (379626)
01-24-2007 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by joshua221
01-24-2007 8:30 PM


Re: Why?
Truly true.
Absolutely true.
Huh?
The problem in most cases there simply is no truly true or Absolute Truth.
You can say that 2 + 2 = 4 is absolutely true.
So far though, no one has been able to present an absolute moral.
You said that noone has put forth a "perfect" model. Perfect morality.
What does perfection have to do with absolute? Try to stick with one subject. What makes you think Absolute Morality would be perfection?
Wait, why is it silly? Because you acknowledge what I am saying about absolutes really existing right?
Of course some absolutes exit. But "Absolute Truth" or "Absolute Morality"? I haven't a clue what they might be.
Frankly, they sound like totally useless constructs. Pointless and inane.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by joshua221, posted 01-24-2007 8:30 PM joshua221 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Phat, posted 01-29-2007 4:00 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 70 of 72 (380863)
01-29-2007 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Phat
01-29-2007 4:00 AM


Re: Why?
Again, what you have posted has nothing to do with what I said.
I do not deny that there are Absolutes.
I have never seen anyone present an example of Absolute Morality or Absolute Truth.
To say that Jesus is some Absolute Standard might be fine if it had any meaning and wasn't just jabberwocky.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Phat, posted 01-29-2007 4:00 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024