If mainstream science willingly and in an unbiased fashion carefully tested the claims of creationists there would be no reason for all these websites, just a communal commitment to scientific truths.
That is the kind of post that only serves to make Christians look at best like fools and actually more like dishonest con men.
Who the hell do you think produced the evidence that the earth was old and that there never was a Biblical flood?
Two hundred years ago the sciences were run by Christians and when the good Christians went out and actually looked at what is really there, what God actually wrote and created, they found that what they had believed about the world, things like Usher's age of the world or the Biblical Floods or the Conquest of Canaan as described in Joshua or the Exodus simply didn't happen.
Over the last 200 years evidence has continued to roll in and from independent lines of inquiry that those who came before could not even imagine. And all of the evidence has supported old earth, evolution, close relationships between all the great apes including humans, no Biblical flood ...
Today's Creationists are simply in denial and totally out of touch with reality.
One thing is true though. It's far easier to claim to do science than it is to actually do science and as long as it is so profitable to just rake in money from Creationists through talks and donations and phony amusement parks that call themselves "Museums" there is no incentive to do otherwise.
Thar's Gold in them thar Creationists pockets.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin then ---> them
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
™ Version 4.2
