Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
66 online now:
ICANT, nwr (2 members, 64 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,211 Year: 10,959/23,288 Month: 211/1,763 Week: 178/390 Day: 67/32 Hour: 1/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Age of mankind, dating, and the flood
Posts: 3976
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 2.1

Message 14 of 224 (705265)
08-25-2013 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by kofh2u
08-25-2013 3:16 PM

Re: ...changing minds...
kofh2u writes:

True, but the point is that without a knowledge of geometry of any sort, or in the face of someone who is not willing to accept the first eight basic Axioms which can not and have never been proven themselves, your arguments are useless to you against their convictions.

I'm not sure if you know what you're talking about. Can you describe it in another way?
Can you explain these "first eight basic Axioms"? That doesn't seem to be general terminology for... anything.

Why do you think they need to be proven themselves? Most axioms in mathematics are more definitions than anything that requires proof of any kind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by kofh2u, posted 08-25-2013 3:16 PM kofh2u has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020