Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 79 (8975 total)
 42 online now: Diomedes, PaulK, Tangle (3 members, 39 visitors) Newest Member: baidoithuongvn Post Volume: Total: 875,784 Year: 7,532/23,288 Month: 91/1,347 Week: 108/342 Day: 5/30 Hour: 0/4

EvC Forum Science Forums Creation/Evolution Miscellany

# Relevance of origins to modern science

Author Topic:   Relevance of origins to modern science
JonF
Member
Posts: 6095
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.3

 Message 46 of 124 (707318) 09-26-2013 10:18 AM Reply to: Message 42 by Ra3MaN09-26-2013 4:38 AM

 - Why are all galaxies not spinning in the same direction (conserved momentum)? - "we are working on it..."

Nobody's working on it. There's nothing to work on. Conservation of angular momentum does not require all galaxies (or any system) to spin in the same direction, it requires that the total angular momentum not change in the absence of outside influences (and I'm not sure it even applies to the Universe as described by general relativity). Have you calculated the total angular momentum of the Universe at different points in time and found a disparity?

 - How can distance be measured in light years when the speed of light is subject to gravity... etc.?

Again nobody's working on that. The speed of light measured in any frame is a constant and not subject to gravity. The direction of light is subject to gravity.

 This message is a reply to: Message 42 by Ra3MaN, posted 09-26-2013 4:38 AM Ra3MaN has not yet responded

JonF
Member
Posts: 6095
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.3

 Message 47 of 124 (707320) 09-26-2013 10:26 AM Reply to: Message 43 by Ra3MaN09-26-2013 4:57 AM

 Is inference upon inference really empirical science, ...

Yes, when uncountable numbers of independent inferences agree.

 or just making jigsaw puzzle pieces fit?

Nobody's forcing any puzzle pieces to fit, we're just putting the puzzle together in the only way that fits. Is that a problem?

 This message is a reply to: Message 43 by Ra3MaN, posted 09-26-2013 4:57 AM Ra3MaN has not yet responded

JonF
Member
Posts: 6095
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 2.3

 Message 94 of 124 (707782) 10-01-2013 7:42 AM Reply to: Message 92 by Ra3MaN10-01-2013 7:08 AM

 Doesn't being Atheist mean that you can hold you own e.g. moral standards, as a result of there being no God? Won't this impact how you see everything else?

No.

It is a fact that atheists are pretty much as moral as everyone else. There are some indications they are more moral than others. There's no point in trying to argue that they can't be moral, the interesting question is why are they moral. There are some interesting sociological and evolutionary hypotheses as to why.

Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

 This message is a reply to: Message 92 by Ra3MaN, posted 10-01-2013 7:08 AM Ra3MaN has acknowledged this reply

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)
 Newer Topic | Older Topic Jump to:Board Administration     The Public Record     Announcements     Proposed New Topics     Suggestions and Questions Science Forums     The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy     Big Bang and Cosmology     Dates and Dating     Education and Creation/Evolution     Biological Evolution     Geology and the Great Flood     Human Origins and Evolution     Intelligent Design     Is It Science?     Creation/Evolution Miscellany     Origin of Life Social and Religious Issues     Bible Study     Comparative Religions     Social Issues and Creation/Evolution     Faith and Belief     Theological Creationism and ID Side Orders     Coffee House     The Great Debate     Free For All     Post of the Month     Links and Information     Creation/Evolution In The News     The Book Nook     Columnist     Practice Makes Perfect Archives     Topic Proposals Archive     Showcase Retired Forums     Short Subjects (No new topics or messages)     Welcome visitors