Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,822 Year: 4,079/9,624 Month: 950/974 Week: 277/286 Day: 38/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are evolution and creationism mutually exclusive?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2978 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 8 of 15 (493900)
01-11-2009 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by twinbanj
01-10-2009 9:16 AM


Hi twinbanj,
Being a biology student, but having many friends who are church going christians, ive always wonderd why Evolution and creationism are mutualy exclusive? Why can't they both, work side by side?
I guess it comes down to what one believes is created. If by created you mean the universe, then science and religion, I believe, can co-exist. However, if by creation one means every single species, planet, solar system, etc, requires a hands on creator, then they cannot since evolution, and many other scientific theories, show evidence to the contrary.
A popular theory.
Popular amongst who...? Accepted by physicist seems better, don't you think?
According to this theory, a giant explosion caused all matter to be hurled appart which then swirled up into planets and then life came togerther on a planet (or planets) and evolved etc etc until we are here today.
No explosion, nothing caused anything, matter required for planets appears much, much later.
Isn't it possible for the energy in the theorized big bang, to be a god?
It is not an explosion that takes a certain amount of energy. An explosion would need to happen at a point in space and in time, since there is no surrounding spacetime no such explosion can occur.
Compressed space expanded, where, right where you are right now, no energy required.
Is that God...?
Does that sound like any God you have ever heard of...?
Is God mearly any point in the history of our universe that needs a bit more explaining...?
Personally, the God of the Gaps never seemed like a good argument. I respect more so fundamentalist who are forced to stick to scriptures and those scriptures can be challenged. People who take the God of the Gaps approach are sneaky because they just keep moving the goal post to where ever it suits them.
Edited by onifre, : spelling...

"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by twinbanj, posted 01-10-2009 9:16 AM twinbanj has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024