Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8965 total)
42 online now:
Coragyps, Dogmafood, DrJones*, jar, LamarkNewAge, Percy (Admin) (6 members, 36 visitors)
Newest Member: javier martinez
Post Volume: Total: 873,028 Year: 4,776/23,288 Month: 1,681/1,286 Week: 348/615 Day: 40/42 Hour: 5/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Polar reversals how do you fit them in a young earth hypothesis
ringo
Member
Posts: 18019
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 7 of 16 (709443)
10-26-2013 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by frako
10-25-2013 5:18 PM


There are several possibilities:
  1. The evidence is wrong. There were never any reversals.
  2. There were reversals but they don't matter. Wildlife doesn't use magnetism.
  3. Wildlife rapidly microevolved to adapt to the changes.
  4. etc.
The standard creationist M.O. will consist of switching between these "explanations" whenever it's convenient.

Edited by ringo, : Splling.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by frako, posted 10-25-2013 5:18 PM frako has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020