Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9094 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Post Volume: Total: 901,734 Year: 12,846/6,534 Month: 129/2,210 Week: 70/390 Day: 26/44 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The not so distant star light problem
Taq
Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 3.3


(1)
Message 11 of 111 (710473)
11-05-2013 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by shalamabobbi
11-05-2013 1:04 PM


Re: Too clever by half...
Since they are relying upon supernaturalism to begin with why all of the weaving of pseudoscientific BS into their arguments? Why not just be satisfied with supernaturalism?
Deep down they know that the scientific argument is the better and more rational explanation. Just look at how they use the word "faith" or "religion" as a terms of derision when talking about evolution. All of the time you see creationists claiming that evolution requires too much faith, or is just another religion. Not once have I ever seen a scientist or "evolutionist" proclaiming that creationism is just another science, or that it requires too much logic, reason, and evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by shalamabobbi, posted 11-05-2013 1:04 PM shalamabobbi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by shalamabobbi, posted 11-06-2013 11:16 AM Taq has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 50 of 111 (710899)
11-12-2013 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by marc9000
11-09-2013 8:31 PM


Re: Calling young earthers to the podium
If you're saying that the sn1987 explosion HAD to have happened long before creation week, then you're doing two questionable things, 1) You're still trying to fit the supernatural act of creation into the very limited time frame that humans are capable of understanding, and 2) you're taking on faith, (accepting as fact) all the guesses and speculation about hundreds of thousands of light years, things that are not science, not falsifiable.
As you have been shown, the distance to SN1987a is based on measurements, not faith. Will you admit your error? That would be the honest thing to do.
Also, you seem to suggest that God included a fake history as part of the creation, a history that has no function other than to fool us. Is this really what you are claiming?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by marc9000, posted 11-09-2013 8:31 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by NoNukes, posted 11-12-2013 12:46 PM Taq has not replied
 Message 57 by marc9000, posted 11-12-2013 11:53 PM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022