Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist inconsistency when inferring relatedness
CosmicChimp
Member
Posts: 311
From: Muenchen Bayern Deutschland
Joined: 06-15-2007


Message 3 of 78 (711241)
11-16-2013 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Atheos canadensis
11-15-2013 9:32 AM


Greetings Atheos canadensis and welcome to the forum.
May I ask you questions for clarification? Must morphology be a clear assessor of relatedness? Must it be? If so, under what parameters would morphology be used to support ToE as opposed to other parameters where it would support poof into being theory (i.e. YE creationism)?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Atheos canadensis, posted 11-15-2013 9:32 AM Atheos canadensis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Atheos canadensis, posted 11-16-2013 7:56 PM CosmicChimp has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024