What is the value of making a claim about what happened a million years ago? You would need a time machine to validate it.
So, you would have us not examine any evidence from the distant past? You would have us not even attempt to learn anything about what went on before?
As an archaeologist, let me suggest that is a very poor attitude, and one that is not borne out by the evidence. We can learn about the past.
Also, let me suggest that the only reason you don't want us and the other -ologists exploring the past is that you don't like the answers we are coming up with.
Am I supposed to start scratching my bottom, swinging in trees and eating bananas? The implications attached to the ramifications of evolution are largely negative and derogatory to human status.
And what has that to do with their accuracy? You don't like the results so you badmouth the process?
Better you should first examine how the results were obtained, and check out the process--the scientific method. But then, that might involve some study and learning, and you might have to accept those results if the process and data stand up to your scrutiny.
So, are you up to the challenge?
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle
If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1
™ Version 4.2
(1)