Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,816 Year: 4,073/9,624 Month: 944/974 Week: 271/286 Day: 32/46 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was Jesus' crucifixion all part of God's plan?
Raphael
Member (Idle past 489 days)
Posts: 173
From: Southern California, United States
Joined: 09-29-2007


Message 116 of 175 (714138)
12-20-2013 4:57 AM


Well shoot dang. 5 years later you guys are still goin at it
Edited by Raphael, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Phat, posted 12-20-2013 10:53 AM Raphael has replied

  
Raphael
Member (Idle past 489 days)
Posts: 173
From: Southern California, United States
Joined: 09-29-2007


Message 142 of 175 (714794)
12-27-2013 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Phat
12-20-2013 10:53 AM


Re: Raphael and Gods Plan
Haha Phat you are too kind. I don't claim to have any advice for wiser minds. Just thought I'd stop by, wish everyone happy holidays, see if Jar is still brilliant, you know .
But I'll do my best to stay on-topic. I think this is an interesting one for sure. I'm coming into it a bit late, but I'd love to throw some things out there.
faitheist writes:
Did God plan the whole thing? Was the life and times of Jesus, including his death and the betrayal by Judas all part of God's plan?
A great question, one that makes sense to ask considering the circumstances of Christ's death. I have been through some of this thread, but not the whole thing so if I'm rehashing things just let me know and I'll sit back down
It seems to me that in order to ask this question, we need to backpedal and ask a few bigger-picture questions. The reason being: Trying to answer a clearly biblically-based question is to assume that the Bible is a legitimate source of reference. Asking if the crucifixion was "all part of God's plan" is to assume that, by the nature of the question, there is a God. Therefore I am going to assume we are talking about The bible within the context that it can be trusted, since you inferred that it can with your question.
My questions:
- Was Jesus a real historical figure?
- If he was, can the things he said about himself be taken seriously? Assuming the Bible is a reliable source, what are some things he said about himself that confirm his testimony?
- If he wasn't, why even ask about the crucifixion?
- If God did not plan the crucifixion, and it just "happened," how would that affect christianity?
Again, excuse me if I'm treading lukewarm water here, but I believe in order to ask a question like that, some things have to be established, you know?
- Raph
Edited by Raphael, : No reason given.
Edited by Raphael, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Phat, posted 12-20-2013 10:53 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Phat, posted 12-28-2013 5:31 AM Raphael has replied
 Message 145 by ringo, posted 12-28-2013 10:48 AM Raphael has not replied

  
Raphael
Member (Idle past 489 days)
Posts: 173
From: Southern California, United States
Joined: 09-29-2007


Message 144 of 175 (714817)
12-28-2013 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 143 by Phat
12-28-2013 5:31 AM


Re: Raphael and Gods Plan
Again, I don't mean to detract from the ongoing conversation, so if that's what I'm doing call me out.
Awesome. So. If we're saying that Jesus is not only a real historical figure, but that the things he said can be trusted (or at least for the sake of the argument), all we can do to answer the question is look at what Jesus says himself.
We find the story in John 10:14-18. Jesus has just healed a man born blind on the Jewish Sabbath, causing the Jewish religious sect known as the "Pharisees" to freak out and not only cast this healed man out of the temple, but redouble their efforts to destroy Jesus. These scriptures are Jesus speaking to those same Pharisees after calling them blind, trying to help them understand the reality of his mission.
I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep. And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd. For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father. - John 10:14-18 (ESV)
I won't claim to have the wisdom to try and exegesis here, it's much too easy to read my own beliefs into the text. But I think it is fair to say that here we get to see Jesus basically answer our question.
What does the text say?
-Raph

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Phat, posted 12-28-2013 5:31 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Phat, posted 12-31-2013 4:22 PM Raphael has replied

  
Raphael
Member (Idle past 489 days)
Posts: 173
From: Southern California, United States
Joined: 09-29-2007


(1)
Message 147 of 175 (715045)
12-31-2013 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Phat
12-31-2013 4:22 PM


Re: Too Funny Yet Sad
ringo writes:
Assuming that Jesus was a real historical figure, there is no reason to think he was any more truthful - or more honest in self-assessment - than any other historical figure.
Gotcha. A fair assessment . So if, by that train of thought, Jesus is no more credible or invalid as any other historical figure, and the question is "was Jesus' crucifixion all part of God's plan?" we see him answering the question here, in his own words. I think we try to overcomplicate things sometimes I know I sure have.
In the same way, we could take the words of another historical figure, Napoleon Bonaparte, and asses his values.
quote:
Women are nothing but machines for producing children.
  —Napoleon Bonaparte
No way am I smart enough to have that quote memorized haha. The power of Google. But. If we're merely looking at Jesus as a historical figure, then what he says should tell us a lot about who he is, and what his mission was. Who does he seem to be to you?
Phat writes:
...we will attempt to quote biblical text and the critics will say that redactors actually wrote the book and that the text reflects that bias...another day we will attempt to explain the meaning of what God meant to say and our critics will use the very same Bible that they rejected...
Haha. Phat my friend, our problem is we get into unnecessary arguments. We try and argue the little things, the details, and we try to do it on the non-believer's terms. We try to prove the existence of God with science. I know I have tried. Which is a paradox because science cannot prove the existence of a "great other." That's not its job. It only can tell us what we can observe, hypothesize, and/or test. When it really comes down to it, belief in something outside of ourselves takes one thing: faith. That's really it haha. Sure there's evidence, sure there's history, sure there's personal experience, but it really just comes down to the question: will you believe in something incredible? Something that, in reality, doesn't make sense? For me, believing has changed my life. My God is to be trusted. But that's subjective .
Phat writes:
I love the people who are here, but the theology frustrates me...they simply won't embrace the power of the resurrection.
Haha. And that's the fun of it buddy. I love all you guys! It's been awhile, but it's fun to see the names from years ago here. I'd rather keep up the debates, maintain that camaraderie, than be a jerk and try and convert everyone. Jesus does the heartstring thing. So it's chilll
Edited by Raphael, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Phat, posted 12-31-2013 4:22 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024