Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On The Limits of Human Talent
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 8 of 126 (711405)
11-18-2013 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by marc9000
11-17-2013 4:40 PM


When Proverbs 3:5 says, "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding," I don't think it means we should deny scientific observations. The context has to do with keeping God's commandments, being truthful and merciful, etc.
Proverbs in general is common sense, not an excuse for any nonsense about Bible inerrancy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by marc9000, posted 11-17-2013 4:40 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by marc9000, posted 11-20-2013 7:34 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(1)
Message 28 of 126 (711683)
11-21-2013 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by marc9000
11-20-2013 7:34 PM


marc9000 writes:
The point of this thread is that we should be able to distinguish between useful science and wasteful science, or science that's only intent is to promote the destruction of Christianity.
The key word there is "we". We are making that distinction whether you like it or not. We are society, not just your little cult. Our intent is not to promote the destruction of Christianity whether you think it is or not. If Christianity implodes because of what we do, that is not our fault, it's your fault.
marc9000 writes:
We should recognize the importance of leaving alone mysteries that belong only to God.
We don't know what mysteries belong only to God. If you think you do, you're pretty arrogant.
marc9000 writes:
I"m not saying that atheists shouldn't be permitted to study their secular curiousities all they want. They should just do on their own time with their own money, and not teach it as fact in public science classes.
It's a matter of secular money being used by secular scientisits for secular purposes. What "should not be" is one religious sect dictating to everybody else what is taboo.
marc9000 writes:
And questioning public searches for atheist support.
I'm not sure if you're making a play on the word "talent" deliberately or inadvertently.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by marc9000, posted 11-20-2013 7:34 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 64 of 126 (711930)
11-24-2013 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by marc9000
11-23-2013 8:56 PM


Re: I guess I need to chip in here.
marc9000 writes:
What advise would you have for me to answer 12 opponents?
Les Wynan and more answerin'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by marc9000, posted 11-23-2013 8:56 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 123 of 126 (712226)
11-29-2013 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by shalamabobbi
11-28-2013 1:03 PM


Re: summary
shalamabobbi writes:
You see rage. I see people bending over backwards with patience.
Rage and back pain produce similar grimaces.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by shalamabobbi, posted 11-28-2013 1:03 PM shalamabobbi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by shalamabobbi, posted 11-30-2013 12:32 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024