Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9072 total)
74 online now:
dwise1, kjsimons, nwr, Percy (Admin) (4 members, 70 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Happy Birthday: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,122 Year: 4,234/6,534 Month: 448/900 Week: 154/150 Day: 8/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there a legitimate argument for design?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 231 of 638 (725254)
04-25-2014 4:48 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by Ed67
04-24-2014 4:00 PM


Re: What does the CODE in DNA do?
Hi Ed67, welcome to EvC!

Ed67 writes:

In a molecule.

I think the point people are trying to make is that there is nothing in the molecule (other than the various bonds). The physical structure is the sum totality of the molecule and all of the effects it can have are a result of the physical structure.

It simply is. It does not have something non physical embedded into it to act the way it does.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Ed67, posted 04-24-2014 4:00 PM Ed67 has taken no action

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 473 of 638 (736973)
09-15-2014 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 367 by taiji2
09-12-2014 5:51 AM


Re: Welcome
taiji2 writes:

I am not speaking of subjective study such as psychology.

Psychology is not subjective in any greater sense than any other field that employs the scientific method.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 367 by taiji2, posted 09-12-2014 5:51 AM taiji2 has taken no action

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 474 of 638 (736974)
09-15-2014 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 380 by taiji2
09-12-2014 3:42 PM


Re: Answer Pt. 1: Ideas
taiji2 writes:

I dismiss psychology as subjective because it deals with the interpretation of ideas and their effect on the patient.

You are conflating psychology with psychotherapy.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 380 by taiji2, posted 09-12-2014 3:42 PM taiji2 has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022