Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9178 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,081 Year: 5,338/9,624 Month: 363/323 Week: 3/204 Day: 3/21 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there a legitimate argument for design?
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


(1)
Message 322 of 638 (733223)
07-15-2014 11:09 AM


I say there is not a legitimate argument for design. 3% of humans are born with a major defect. Toyota has a better QC program than this.

Replies to this message:
 Message 323 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-15-2014 12:01 PM FLRW has not replied
 Message 324 by ringo, posted 07-15-2014 12:48 PM FLRW has not replied

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 325 of 638 (733449)
07-17-2014 11:14 AM


What would be the feature of a six legged human baby?

Replies to this message:
 Message 329 by ringo, posted 07-17-2014 12:44 PM FLRW has not replied

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 326 of 638 (733451)
07-17-2014 11:22 AM


I suppose you could say that an intelligent designer wanted to create trees but animals and humans were the result of his creation errors.

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 327 of 638 (733452)
07-17-2014 11:28 AM


No CS, but I say .0001% would be .

Replies to this message:
 Message 328 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-17-2014 11:51 AM FLRW has not replied

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 330 of 638 (733468)
07-17-2014 1:00 PM


zr, recently in the news there was a story about a baby born with 6 legs. CS, what do you think is an acceptable error for the design of humans?

Replies to this message:
 Message 331 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-17-2014 1:13 PM FLRW has not replied
 Message 333 by ringo, posted 07-17-2014 1:46 PM FLRW has not replied

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 332 of 638 (733471)
07-17-2014 1:29 PM


Being a moral person, I would say it is 0. Why would you design a human with any error? Haven't we just proven that humans are not a product of intelligent design? Or have we proven that humans are the product of imperfect design?

Replies to this message:
 Message 334 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-17-2014 2:08 PM FLRW has replied

  
FLRW
Member (Idle past 584 days)
Posts: 73
Joined: 10-08-2007


Message 335 of 638 (733482)
07-17-2014 2:28 PM
Reply to: Message 334 by New Cat's Eye
07-17-2014 2:08 PM


CS, thanks and I agree with you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 334 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-17-2014 2:08 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024