Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Is there a legitimate argument for design?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there a legitimate argument for design?
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

Normal Thread Display

(2)
Message 269 of 638 (725413)
04-26-2014 11:50 PM 		Reply to: Message 268 by Ed67
04-26-2014 11:38 PM

Re: What does the CODE in DNA do?
SALT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE CODE FOR BUILDING OF PROTEINS.
​
Of course not, it's not DNA.
​
It does, however, contain the code for preserving Cod in a barrel. How amazing.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Ed67, posted 04-26-2014 11:38 PM Ed67 has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by NoNukes, posted 04-27-2014 1:55 AM Capt Stormfield has replied
  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 271 of 638 (725422)
04-27-2014 2:51 AM 		Reply to: Message 270 by NoNukes
04-27-2014 1:55 AM

Re: What does the CODE in DNA do?
Cod ice cream?
​
That would be....SATAN!
​
Say, it's fun pulling a word or 2 from the previous post and creating a non sequitur response, just like Fred68.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by NoNukes, posted 04-27-2014 1:55 AM NoNukes has not replied
  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 337 of 638 (734212)
07-26-2014 8:50 PM 		Reply to: Message 336 by mram10
07-26-2014 5:43 PM

Sexual v asexual reproduction shows design more-so than evolution. Evolution could have found a better way to allow for more anti-bodies and viral resistance than to make 2 different sets of organs, separate hormone levels, etc.
​
This seems ass backwards to me. It seems like design would use the better way (if indeed there is one), while evolution, not having a goal in mind, is stuck with whatever shows up variationwise. Where did you get the idea that evolution should result in the "better" way to accomplish any particular physiologic task?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by mram10, posted 07-26-2014 5:43 PM mram10 has not replied
  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

Normal Thread Display

(5)
Message 338 of 638 (734213)
07-26-2014 8:53 PM 		Reply to: Message 336 by mram10
07-26-2014 5:43 PM

Where did natural selection get it's intelligence?
​
How do waves on a steep beach know how to sort rocks according to size?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by mram10, posted 07-26-2014 5:43 PM mram10 has not replied
  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 339 of 638 (734214)
07-26-2014 8:57 PM 		Reply to: Message 336 by mram10
07-26-2014 5:43 PM

Where did the intelligence come from to make the different sexes?
​
What makes you think that requires intelligence? You seem to be making a lot of unsubstantiated assertions. Your questions have no substance unless you support the premises underlying them.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by mram10, posted 07-26-2014 5:43 PM mram10 has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024