Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 4/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there a legitimate argument for design?
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 616 of 638 (737335)
09-22-2014 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 615 by RAZD
09-22-2014 2:38 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
You are confusing your providing an answer to the question "How is the sky blue" with the question I asked being a why question "that is not just a how question.
If that is the case, then all why questions are actually how questions?
As has been mentioned before, the definition of the word why is not limited to the one you give it. And if we make the restriction you are insisting on, then all questions are how questions.
Both of those arguments are direct rebuttal of your position of how vs what. Your only response so far has been to repeat your position, sometimes with a different question.
If instead you want to ask, what ultimate purpose for the sky being blue, for which that ultimate purpose has no predecessor, then why don't you phrase your question that way instead of pretending that you are in charge of the dictionary.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 615 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2014 2:38 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 617 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2014 4:27 PM NoNukes has replied
 Message 618 by Percy, posted 09-22-2014 5:06 PM NoNukes has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1395 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 617 of 638 (737347)
09-22-2014 4:27 PM
Reply to: Message 616 by NoNukes
09-22-2014 2:43 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
If that is the case, then all why questions are actually how questions?
And you accuse me of moving the goal posts.
No, why questions should have why answers just as how answers are for how questions.
As has been mentioned before, the definition of the word why is not limited to the one you give it. And if we make the restriction you are insisting on, then all questions are how questions.
Curiously I feel that using different words to mean different things improves clarity in debate, while confusing definitions of one word with another allows for equivocation and confusion.
Both of those arguments are direct rebuttal of your position of how vs what. Your only response so far has been to repeat your position, sometimes with a different question.
Your argument is based on repeated confusion of one with the other rather than a real rebuttal.
If instead you want to ask, what ultimate purpose for the sky being blue, for which that ultimate purpose has no predecessor, then why don't you phrase your question that way instead of pretending that you are in charge of the dictionary.
That would be moving the goal posts ...
Which is unnecessary as it is irrelevant to the issue of "why" questions vs "how" questions and having answers that provide testable predictions that can be pursued with science -- and the fact that all the answers you have provided thus far for what can provide testable predictions that can be pursued with science are the answers to "how" questions.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 616 by NoNukes, posted 09-22-2014 2:43 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 620 by NoNukes, posted 09-22-2014 10:29 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22359
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 618 of 638 (737355)
09-22-2014 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 616 by NoNukes
09-22-2014 2:43 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
NoNukes writes:
As has been mentioned before, the definition of the word why is not limited to the one you give it. And if we make the restriction you are insisting on, then all questions are how questions.
I'm mostly just trying to follow along in this discussion you're having with RAZD, but I thought I'd add my two cents. The way I see it, most words have more than one meaning and more than one sense in which they can be used. Sometimes someone asks "why" and wants to know the reason or purpose, e.g., "Why did you hit me?" Other times they want to understand the causes or mechanisms, e.g., "Why did the plane crash?" If I've been reading you right then I think we agree that one can't assign a single approach to interpreting "why" questions.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 616 by NoNukes, posted 09-22-2014 2:43 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 619 by NoNukes, posted 09-22-2014 10:28 PM Percy has replied
 Message 630 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-23-2014 9:20 PM Percy has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 619 of 638 (737374)
09-22-2014 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 618 by Percy
09-22-2014 5:06 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
Why did the plane crash?" If I've been reading you right then I think we agree that one can't assign a single approach to interpreting
I don't think we all agree on that. I don't see any way to approach RAZD's responses as saying anything other than that "why did the plane crash" is not an appropriate question if the answer you are looking for is something like engine failure or pilot error.
ABE:
In fact, even a reason such as the pilot developed a paranoid delusion that the passengers were aliens intent on taking over earth, and so he flew the airplane into a mountain just tells us how the plane crashed and not why? As I understand RAZD's position, no answer that gives a natural, probabilistic, or human volition reason for any action is the answer to a true why question.
In fact, I doubt that a why answer, scientific or not exists under the definition being insisted on.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 618 by Percy, posted 09-22-2014 5:06 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 621 by Percy, posted 09-22-2014 11:47 PM NoNukes has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 620 of 638 (737375)
09-22-2014 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 617 by RAZD
09-22-2014 4:27 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
No, why questions should have why answers just as how answers are for how questions.
I yield.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 617 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2014 4:27 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22359
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 621 of 638 (737380)
09-22-2014 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 619 by NoNukes
09-22-2014 10:28 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
NoNukes writes:
I don't think we all agree on that.
If I read you right, you and I agree.
I don't see any way to approach RAZD's responses as saying anything other than that "why did the plane crash" is not an appropriate question if the answer you are looking for is something like engine failure or pilot error.
That's what I thought RAZD was saying. Makes no sense. Words have multiple meanings. "Why did the plane crash?", "What caused the plane to crash?", "How come the plane crashed?", they're all the same question.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 619 by NoNukes, posted 09-22-2014 10:28 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 623 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 12:21 PM Percy has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 622 of 638 (737382)
09-23-2014 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 615 by RAZD
09-22-2014 2:38 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
Curiously I can only speak for the universe I occupy, and that in a limited way. I see no way to test predictions about the color of skies in alternate universes, perhaps you can help me with that?
You seem, for good reason, to be avoiding saying that the color of the sky in universe 1123434 is not a scientific question. I don't know if such a proposition will ever be testable, but I don't see any metaphysical reason that it must be ultimately untestable.
Why is the sky blue?
NoNukes writes:
If you can come up with a why question that has no answer that is not just a how question, ...
RAZD writes:
Why is the sky blue?
You might want to reconsider your answer.
If you indeed believe that such a question has only a how answer, (science deduced or not) and that is indeed what I asked you for, then we should not be surprised if either science or a ouija board fails to provide an answer.
If in fact all possible answers to that question are actually how answers, scientific or not, then what you are saying is that science is as successful as every other line of reasoning at answering the question.
My proposition is that using your definition there are no true why questions. I am asking you to demonstrate that I am wrong by making up a why answer to a question of your choice.
ABE:
In the spirit of providing openness, what I intend to do is to follow up your why question and answer with yet another why question that relegates your chosen Q&A to mere how.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
Edited by NoNukes, :

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 615 by RAZD, posted 09-22-2014 2:38 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 623 of 638 (737404)
09-23-2014 12:21 PM
Reply to: Message 621 by Percy
09-22-2014 11:47 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
"Why did the plane crash?", "What caused the plane to crash?", "How come the plane crashed?", they're all the same question.
You've reminded me of an incident from elementary school. One of my 3rd grade buddies had an annoying habit of asking me infinite why questions. I'd answer one question from him about anything, and he'd ask me why and i'd feel compelled to answer only to have him ask why again. Rinse, lather, repeat. One day I after the 9th "Why?' in a row, I told him never to ask me why again. He then asked me "How come?".
As I remember it, the two of us laughed all through recess about his 'work around'. Not sure now what was so funny, but I'm convinced that laughing was the right response.
As you suggest, 'why', 'what for', 'how come', 'by what cause or agency', 'by whose say so', 'for what reason', 'explain the incident in terms of God's plan for man' are all questions that we might intend when we ask 'Why?. But those questions are not synonyms, and in some cases one or more of those alternatives are not even in play.
As best we know, true accidents do occur, non-deterministic processes do exist, humans have free will, hurricanes obey natural laws, and bears do defecate in the woods without getting a hall pass. Not everything can be tied to volition or plan. When such is the case, the why obviously refers to something else, and it is no lack or limitation when one method or another does not answer an inappropriate question.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 621 by Percy, posted 09-22-2014 11:47 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 624 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 12:58 PM NoNukes has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22359
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 624 of 638 (737408)
09-23-2014 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 623 by NoNukes
09-23-2014 12:21 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
NoNukes writes:
As you suggest, 'why', 'what for', 'how come', 'by what cause or agency', 'by whose say so', 'for what reason', 'explain the incident in terms of God's plan for man' are all questions that we might intend when we ask 'Why?. But those questions are not synonyms, and in some cases one or more of those alternatives are not even in play.
As best we know, true accidents do occur, non-deterministic processes do exist, humans have free will, hurricanes obey natural laws, and bears do defecate in the woods without getting a hall pass. Not everything can be tied to volition or plan. When such is the case, the why obviously refers to something else, and it is no lack or limitation when one method or another does not answer an inappropriate question.
Yes, that about covers it.
I can also agree with RAZD that "why questions should have why answers just as how answers are for how questions," with the stipulations that why questions can be stated without the word "why," and how questions can be stated without the word "how."
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 623 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 12:21 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 625 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 1:17 PM Percy has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 625 of 638 (737411)
09-23-2014 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 624 by Percy
09-23-2014 12:58 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
why questions should have why answers just as how answers are for how questions,"
Sure. Whatever your statement turns out to mean, surely it is true. Do you have an example of such a question?
Why isn't the question in this sentence a why question? Why is the question in this second sentence a why question?

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 624 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 12:58 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 626 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 2:44 PM NoNukes has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22359
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 626 of 638 (737414)
09-23-2014 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 625 by NoNukes
09-23-2014 1:17 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
'Fraid you've lost me. The only thing I can contribute to this discussion is that words have no fixed meaning. I may not know what someone means, but if they're saying that a word always means the same thing then I'm pretty sure they're wrong.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 625 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 1:17 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 627 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 3:02 PM Percy has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 627 of 638 (737415)
09-23-2014 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 626 by Percy
09-23-2014 2:44 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
'Fraid you've lost me.
If I lost you, perhaps that illustrates the point. The second question announces itself as a why question. Perhaps from the context of the discussion I may have successfully communicated that I am expecting a different type of answer from the two questions leading with Why.
But even knowing that one of the questions is intended to be 'more why' than the other, it is still unclear exactly what kind of responses are appropriate. It would at this point be ridiculous if you provided an answer, and then I responded by saying that your answer was wrong and that you were confused about the meaning of why. Surely the responsibility for not being clear is mine and not yours.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 626 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 2:44 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 628 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 8:07 PM NoNukes has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22359
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 628 of 638 (737427)
09-23-2014 8:07 PM
Reply to: Message 627 by NoNukes
09-23-2014 3:02 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
I still feel I'm not getting you, you may be slicing the onion too thin for me, but what you say reminds me how difficult it can sometimes be to be unambiguous, especially with someone with radically different views.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 627 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 3:02 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 629 by NoNukes, posted 09-23-2014 9:14 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 629 of 638 (737431)
09-23-2014 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 628 by Percy
09-23-2014 8:07 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
Looks like it's just an illustration that does not illuminate well. My bad.

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 628 by Percy, posted 09-23-2014 8:07 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 630 of 638 (737433)
09-23-2014 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 618 by Percy
09-22-2014 5:06 PM


Re: why is the sky blue?
I'm mostly just trying to follow along in this discussion you're having with RAZD, but I thought I'd add my two cents. The way I see it, most words have more than one meaning and more than one sense in which they can be used. Sometimes someone asks "why" and wants to know the reason or purpose, e.g., "Why did you hit me?" Other times they want to understand the causes or mechanisms, e.g., "Why did the plane crash?" If I've been reading you right then I think we agree that one can't assign a single approach to interpreting "why" questions.
That's exactly the point I was making to RAZD. ABE: see Message 534
And that his insistence that the "why" questions must be ones of ultimate purpose is just Begging the Question.
Am I not correct?
Edited by Cat Sci, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 618 by Percy, posted 09-22-2014 5:06 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 631 by Percy, posted 09-24-2014 7:18 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 632 by Stile, posted 09-24-2014 9:28 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024