|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 52 (9226 total) |
| |
ChemEngrMBA | |
Total: 921,199 Year: 1,521/6,935 Month: 284/518 Week: 51/73 Day: 1/36 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Humour VIII | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 6259 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
Like I said, I had to blink a couple times before I got it.
ABE: Latest joke I tell everybody now: The newest arrival to Heaven asks God the question that had vexed him his entire life: "What's the meaning of the universe?" God: "Well if I have to explain it, then that ruins the joke." Edited by dwise1, : ABEEdited by dwise1, : making pi (π) larger and hence more apparent
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23283 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.5
|
I didn't get it either, but I thought it was n ≠ a/b, not π ≠ a/b. Hard to tell the difference in this font: nπnπnπnπnπ
Found a good pi character online, but it didn't survive the trip through the database, so I'll switch to the Courier New font. Here's the expression again: π ≠ a/b But a and b don't have to be integers for a/b to be rational. While being expressible as the ratio of two integers is the definition of a rational number (where the denominator is not zero), the opposite is not true. In other words, it isn't true that all ratios involving non-integers are irrational. For example, when a=1.1 and b=2.2 then neither is an integer, but a/b is still a rational number. I think the only constraints on a and b for that inequality to be true are that they both be rational and b be non-zero. And of course there are an infinity of irrational values of a and b for which the inequality remains true. And there are many values of a and b that will render the inequality wrong, for example, when a=π and b=1. Since I don't get the joke, I feel I am missing the point. --Percy Edited by Percy, : Couldn't use the pi character I found online.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8733 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
I can't get a pi symbol to take either. Displays just fine in message edit preview but it won't transfer to post on submit.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minnemooseus Member Posts: 3986 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: Member Rating: 5.8
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18082 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
I think you’re inverting the logic Percy. There is nothing about the ratio of two non-integers there at all. What it is saying is that n is not expressible as the ratio of two integers - which would make it irrational.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8733 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Since I don't get the joke, I feel I am missing the point. The joke is that the math students in the n ≠ a/b t-shirts were saying they were irrational. Growing up a math nerd makes it funny if you know math nerds.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 23283 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.5
|
PaulK writes: I think you’re inverting the logic Percy. There is nothing about the ratio of two non-integers there at all. There is nothing about the ratio of two integers there, either.
What it is saying is that n is not expressible as the ratio of two integers - which would make it irrational. Nowhere in π ≠ a/b are a and b constrained to be integers. There are non-integer values of a and b for which the inequality is also true. Maybe it's like this. People who get a/b as a reference to irrational numbers because it was part of the particular definition of rational numbers they were exposed to (e.g., a/b is a common way of defining rational numbers on the Internet) think it's cute and leave it at that. People who don't get the a/b reference because they were exposed to a different definition (e.g., p/q or "ratio of two integers") and have to have it explained to them will immediately note that theres nothing in π ≠ a/b that defines a and b as integers. The values of a and b that satisfy the inequality π ≠ a/b include more than just integers. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2661 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
Percy writes:
theres nothing in π ≠ a/b that defines a and b as integers correct. pi and 1.0 for example. perhaps the T-shirt would be more accurate if it was π ≠ j/k where now the computerese assumption about j and k being integers would enter into the thinking. p and q are assumed to not be integers as also are a and b."I'm the Grim Reaper now, Mitch. Step aside." Death to #TzarVladimirtheCondemned! Enjoy every sandwich! - xongsmith, 5.7dawkins scale
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6492 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: |
Nowhere in π ≠ a/b are a and b constrained to be integers.
I agree with this. I immediately got the point, but I thought it a very weak joke. It would have been better if it said "π ≠ j/k" or "π ≠ p/q" because those letters are more traditionally used for integers.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9666 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
You're all weird.
Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine. "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kjsimons Member Posts: 836 From: Orlando,FL Joined:
|
LOL, takes me way back to my Fortran days!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18082 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0
|
quote: I have a math degree. Of course I’m weird!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: |
You're all weird. And I bet they are all think t-shirts with strings of binary numbers are great jokes too! It still looks like a lower case N to me, or is that what makes the joke clever?Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2661 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
nwr writes:
It would have been better if it said "π ≠ j/k" or "π ≠ p/q" because those letters are more traditionally used for integers. not p and q...those are traditionally used in probability and thus constrained to the interval (0,1) or [0,1] if the limiting ends are to be included."I'm the Grim Reaper now, Mitch. Step aside." Death to #TzarVladimirtheCondemned! Enjoy every sandwich! - xongsmith, 5.7dawkins scale
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6492 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined:
|
not p and q...those are traditionally used in probability
They are also used by number theorists, as integers.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025