I'm saying that if something is observable by only one human sense, and ALSO involves millions of years in the past, hundreds of light-years away, or conflicts with the basics of Christianity or U.S. foundings, then it may become too vague to be thoroughly enough analyzed by the scientific method.
Can we foreigners still do "the other kind" of science or do the religious or US constitutional restrictions apply?
Is it not silly to claim that we could not use observations today as a tool to decipher the past?
The Oklo natural fission reactor "proves" that the radioactive decay has remained constant for at least 2 billion years - we can safely assume that the science explaining radioactivity is strong and valid though we don't see the atoms splitting.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
