Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9024 total)
40 online now:
PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle (3 members, 37 visitors)
Newest Member: Ryan Merkle
Post Volume: Total: 882,921 Year: 567/14,102 Month: 567/294 Week: 54/269 Day: 0/14 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Human Induced Global warming is just another conjob for the ignorant.
Larni
Member (Idle past 48 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 33 of 65 (716466)
01-17-2014 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by jar
01-12-2014 12:36 PM


Re: Why?
Why not do both?

It will make some rich folks poorer?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 12:36 PM jar has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2014 3:56 PM Larni has responded

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 48 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 43 of 65 (716522)
01-18-2014 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by RAZD
01-17-2014 3:56 PM


Re: This is what global climate change looks like ...
I think you may have misunderstood my British understated, sarcasm.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2014 3:56 PM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021