Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Happy Birthday: AlexCaledin
Post Volume: Total: 904,195 Year: 1,076/14,231 Month: 1,076/1,514 Week: 109/234 Day: 42/48 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Human Induced Global warming is just another conjob for the ignorant.
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 33 of 65 (716466)
01-17-2014 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by jar
01-12-2014 12:36 PM


Re: Why?
Why not do both?
It will make some rich folks poorer?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 12:36 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2014 3:56 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 190 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 43 of 65 (716522)
01-18-2014 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by RAZD
01-17-2014 3:56 PM


Re: This is what global climate change looks like ...
I think you may have misunderstood my British understated, sarcasm.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2014 3:56 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023