Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.
Admin
Director
Posts: 12995
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 2 of 4 (718365)
02-06-2014 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
02-06-2014 12:09 PM


I don't think you can characterize historical science as an invention of creationists, see for example the paper cited by Roxrkool, Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science.
--Percy

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 12:09 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by RAZD, posted 02-06-2014 1:16 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12995
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 4 of 4 (718374)
02-06-2014 1:25 PM


Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science. thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024