Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,175 Year: 5,432/9,624 Month: 457/323 Week: 97/204 Day: 13/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Arizona: Showing America how to avoid thinking since 1912
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 119 of 397 (720888)
02-28-2014 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Faith
02-27-2014 3:31 AM


Re: Such a groundswell of opinion against freedom of religion
If tyranny is making people treat other people equally sign me up for some tyranny please.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 02-27-2014 3:31 AM Faith has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(3)
Message 124 of 397 (720905)
02-28-2014 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Faith
02-27-2014 3:49 PM


Re: Let's limit this discussion to the specifics
Right. Like I just posted. So what's going to happen is that people with a strong moral conviction against gay marriage are going to give up their businesses and go to prison. You're even willing to redefine the situation to be sure you put it in the worst possible light. That's the way the culture is going. That's what you all want.
That would be exactly the thing to do.
If one hates the idea of gays having equality (or in fact if you dislike anything about the culture you live in) get yourself sent to prison for 27 years (should be easy in Freedom loving America) and protest about it.
It worked for Nelson Mandela.
Or whine about it not being okay to refuse services to gays on the internet
Edited by Larni, : DVD extras. Does anyone still watch DVDs?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 02-27-2014 3:49 PM Faith has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 126 of 397 (720908)
02-28-2014 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Faith
02-27-2014 5:21 PM


Re: Let's limit this discussion to the specifics
Those of us who believe the Bible is the inspired inerrant word of God will choose to die rather than be forced to do something that violates it. Apparently that's all right with you. Welcome to the USSA.
Not letting you die for Jesus would be infringing your right to practice your religion.
Edited by Larni, : I haven't bought a DVD is years.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Faith, posted 02-27-2014 5:21 PM Faith has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(4)
Message 128 of 397 (720914)
02-28-2014 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Faith
02-27-2014 5:57 PM


Re: Let's limit this discussion to the specifics
Who are you or the state to dictate to a person's conscience?
It is not dictating conscience, it is dictating behaviour.
It is perfectly fine to imagine smashing someone's window in, but not to actually do it.
It's not thought police: it's behaviour police.
I can only hope Christians will have the backbone to choose God over all these forces of bigotry against them no matter what the consequences.
Back to having the right not to be forced not to die, again? So soon?
So we go out of business then and have to live on the streets. Same difference.
But, you said Christians were willing to die rather than bake cakes for the gays?
So dying is fine but being poor and destitute is not?
Edited by Larni, : Most of the time I just stream stuff off of the Inter Nets
Edited by Larni, : Or torrent it.
Edited by Larni, : But I try to pay for things more these days.
Edited by Larni, : Since I turned forty I'm trying to be more upstanding

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Faith, posted 02-27-2014 5:57 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024