Summations Only

Please substitute the word "gay" with "a black person" or "a jew" and think again.This is not about religious freedom but about discrimination. The hateful bigots just want to have their backs covered when/if they want to act like loathable scum of the earth.Can you even imagine where this slippery slope would end up? A police officer not answering a burglary call because the homeowners are a lesbian couple. Airport security official denying entrance to a gay couple thus making them miss their flight or at the extremes denying entrance of a hetero couple travelling to their daughters gay wedding...There is nothing, absolutely nothing good or admirable in these law proposals - they are just evil and void of anything even remotely good.

Silly, there is no such thing as a sin. They are all made-up concepts to control the masses. Christians are just picking bits they see fit to bolster their agenda and discard those that come too close for comfort.Gays are born that way - can you even begin to comprehend why anyone would choose something that might subject them to ridicule, hate and emotional and bodily harm, even death?About being a citizen nevertheless, in Kansas the wording of the proposal was such that:"But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to barring all anti-discrimination lawsuits against private employers, the new law permits government employees to deny service to gays in the name of religious liberty. This is nothing new, but the sweep of Kansas’ statute is breathtaking. Any government employee is given explicit permission to discriminate against gay couplesnot just county clerks and DMV employees, but literally anyone who works for the state of Kansas. If a gay couple calls the police, an officer may refuse to help them if interacting with a gay couple violates his religious principles. State hospitals can turn away gay couples at the door and deny them treatment with impunity. Gay couples can be banned from public parks, public pools, anything that operates under the aegis of the Kansas state government."Kansas anti-gay segregation bill is an abomination. Edited by saab93f, : No reason given.

Why should religious conviction be given any thought over equality, tolerance or just basic humanity. The people who are in favour of legislation such as this are just bigoted and evil.I cannot comprehend why religious conviction is at all given any more weight than if I was to refuse service because I play badminton or am an active in a political party.

Please tell me Faith how not being human can be moral?Using such a cowardly justification for hatefulness and pettiness speaks more about religion than of anything else.

Not exactly to be nitpicking but were not the earlier generations of Americans actually "indians" or natives? Xianity would not have mattered to them much :-)It is strange how the people of The Religion of Peace (tm) are in many cases actually totally void of any love or even compassion? The religious freedom seems to apply only to which denomination of xianity one belongs to.Edited by saab93f, : Typos

I am quite sure that someone finds a way to discover such a law or at least an order or a decree.The USofA is 238 years old construction. In its soil lay the footprints of several of millenia of people who had never "walked and talked wit Jeebus". To somehow describe what the puritans brought along as what the humanity or even America is altogether about is such narrowmindedness that it even exceeds Faith's bigotry.Edited by saab93f, : Typo, again.

Yes, in a pretty similar fashion as what happened in Africa. Was is Desmond Tutu who said abou the missionaries that "When they came, we had the land and they had the Bibles. Next thing we noticed was that we had the Bibles and they the land"?In most cases the Religion of Love(tm) has been spread with either a sword or a rifle.

Yes, you are right. Of course there were also those who converted voluntarily. Does it vindicate xianity in a similar fashion as it would atheism since peeps turn from xianity to unbelief without coersion?

While it is just fine to say "I don't know", there are limits to which it can be applied. Throwing wild unsubstantiated ideas is all creationists are capable of whether it is water-canopy, racing tectonic plates or in this case Mars and Venus and? being habitable.You do know that just recently we (the human race) got a probe on Mars and what you are implying is that there'd been a way to mass transport billions of people...