Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8994 total)
65 online now:
anglagard, Coragyps, JonF (3 members, 62 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,309 Year: 11,057/23,288 Month: 309/1,763 Week: 276/390 Day: 96/69 Hour: 4/6

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang Found
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 135 of 301 (723298)
03-28-2014 4:56 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by NoNukes
03-27-2014 1:40 PM


Re: You haven't said much here...
Don't forget conference presentations with peers who have been in your field for 40 years.

:yikes:


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by NoNukes, posted 03-27-2014 1:40 PM NoNukes has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3997
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 291 of 301 (737711)
09-28-2014 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by PaulGL
09-28-2014 5:44 PM


Re: Genesis 1:1 = 'Big Bang'
time and space began whereas they had previously

I don't think you thought this bit through. Think about what previously means when you're taking about time beginning.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by PaulGL, posted 09-28-2014 5:44 PM PaulGL has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020