Homosexuality and Evo, Creo, and ID

Faith probably would be out of place in the 17th century; that was the time of King Charles II and Nell Gwyn, of King James II and Arabella Churchill, to say nothing of the future Queen Anne and the Duchess of Marlborough. It was also the time of 'The White Devil' by John Webster, 'Women Beware Women' by Thomas Middleton, and ''Tis Pity She's A Whore' by John Ford. No, keep Faith in the 20th and 21 centuries; she's much safer here.

In my previous reply, I forgot to mention King James I and VI, who gave his name to the 1611 translation of the Bible. King James was notorious for his fondness for handsome young men, particularly Robert Carr (later Earl of Somerset) and George Villiers (later Earl and then Duke of Buckingham). The king's defence of his affair with Villiers is worth quoting; he said:

quote:

---

I, James, am neither God nor an angel, but a man like any other. Therefore I act like a man, and confess to loving those dear to me more than other men. You may be sure that I love the Earl of Buckingham more than anyone else, and more than you who are here assembled. I wish to speak in my own behalf, and not to have it thought to be a defect, for Jesus Christ did the same, and therefore I cannot be blamed. Christ had his John, and I have my George'.

---

As for Robert Carr (the Earl of Somerset), in 1616 (five years after the publication of the King James version of the Bible) his career blew up in one of the most lurid scandals in English history when he and his wife (formerly Frances Howard) were tried for the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury. The scandal had everything: murder, adultery, homosexuality, black magic, perjury, and allegations that the king himself was an accessory. The story is told in all its horrifying detail by Anne Somerset in her book 'Unnatural Murder'.No, if you were looking for high standards of sexual morality, the 17th century was not a good time to live. And yet, it was when Britain and Ireland were ruled by such a king, and when men and women of the character of George Villiers, Robert Carr and Frances Howard were being raised to the peerage that God supposedly bestowed on England the gift of the King James version of the Bible.

First, on the life and character of King James, I think that J.P. Kenyon's book 'The Stuarts' is more reliable than the 'jesus-is-lord' website.
Second, I notice that you did not mention the Overbury murder or the trial of the Earl and Countess of Somerset for the crime.
Third, can you think of any reason why Robert Carr was made Earl of Somerset and George Villiers was made Earl of Buckingham at the age of 25 and Duke of Buckingham - 'the only dukedom granted outside the blood royal between 1485 and 1660' - at 31, other than their being the king's catamites. Neither man possessed the sort of ability that would merit such promotions.
Fourth, we have the correspondence of Buckingham and King James, which is almost too explicit to quote here. Two examples will be enough.From Buckingham to James, July 1624:

quote:

---

'the time I shall never forget at Farnham, where the bed's head could not be found between the master and his dog'

---

From James to Buckingham, shortly before Christmas 1624:

quote:

---

'that we may make at this Christenmass a new marriage, ever to be kept hereafter; for, God so love me, as I desired only to live in this world for your sake, and that I had rather live banished in any part of the world with you, than live a sorrowful widow-life without you. And so God bless you, my sweet child and wife, and grant that ye may ever be a comfort to your dear dad and husband.'

---

Queen Anne died in March 1619, more than five years before the date of this letter. Being in the same situation myself, I accept that a widower might write letters to his wife; my late wife is often in my thoughts, and I suppose that I might put my thoughts on paper in a letter to her. However, King James's letter looks to me like something written to a living person, not to somebody who has been dead for several years.

Perhaps the feeling was mutual.