Homosexuality and Evo, Creo, and ID

Any that were driven away by that post would have come back for the other posts. But since most are off the search engines they just follow the topic and that number should remain within the usual range.The reason I get readers off the search engines has to do with topic. People search on a topic I've posted on and my blog comes up, often at the top of the Google page if my title or key words are well chosen. I also believe I have a unique point of view on some of the topics.I put up a post about the question of censorship so any who see that should respond if there's anything amiss. I can read the blog, that's not the problem, and I assume anyone who uses the URL to get to it wouldn't have a problem either. If there is any censorship it would be from the blog's being removed from the search engines.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

You really think that people who have decided to stop reading your blog will come back as soon as you put up a new post? That's silly.

quote:

---

The reason I get readers off the search engines has to do with topic. People search on a topic I've posted on and my blog comes up, often at the top of the Google page if my title or key words are well chosen. I also believe I have a unique point of view on some of the topics.

---

I doubt that's really the case. And of course you are free to check the search engines as well. I'll bet that you get the same results but I'd be very surprised if many other people did. If they did you'd have a lot more readers than you do (and not just from search engines).

But this is not the first time that a church has had its documents subpoenaed. Churches are not above the law, so this has happened from time to time, and it is well-established in law that they are obliged to comply. For example Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Stewart. See also here for general information about churches and subpoenas. But suddenly, this time, it's the end of the world as we know it. I can think of two reasons why:(1) It's about hating the gays. That's important. The state is now encroaching upon the central dogma of conservative Christianity.(2) The sort of mayfly mentality ubiquitous among conservatives which allows them to think that everything is a novelty --- which allows them, for example, to think that the issuing of executive orders (and, in some really whacked-out cases, the use of the Presidential veto) is a novel assumption of dictatorial powers. Hmm ... fancy a wager? I'd say you're a paranoid loon.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Well, as I said, the laws proposed would (for example) protect a doctor who refused to see a gay patient, or even a police officer who refused to investigate a crime against a gay victim, so long as they can claim it's their religion to hate gay people. Now a religious motivation is not generally an exemption from the law, which is why you still get in trouble if you're a devout Christian and behead someone for being a witch, as just happened in Oklahoma. Or, indeed, if you're a Muslim and blow someone up.

I don't know why I continue to be amazed at the depths of dishonesty and perverted thinking I encounter at EvC. You'd think I'd have long since learned.It's more sinister than wacky, but here's my usual image of its wacko Futility:

This isn't a case of someone criticizing someone in power. This has to do with organizing workers to produce invalid signatures on a petition.

Woopsie, just checked the stats on some of my other blogs. Two of them have high stats today. All the other blogs usually get much lower numbers than the main blog, but for them to go up to such a degree while it goes down to such a degree just does not happen. Veddy interesting.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

As I already said, the signatures were validated by the City Secretary, then illegally and fraudulently disqualified by the City Attorney. This is what prompted the lawsuitHouston 5: Dropping subpoenas isn't enough, mayorEdited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

In an odd coincidence, gays and cakes and lawyers are in the news here today. This looks to me like an ambush - the cake offensive is now on globally. Christian bigots had better start learning to be 'too busy' to take on these kind of orders. http://www.theweek.co.uk/...t-christian-bakery#ixzz3IJ53tiBt

What was illegal or fraudelent about the disqualifications?

Looks to me like they are targeted in such a way as to be caught off guard because the whole point is to take legal action against them. Seems the One World Order is using the Gay Agenda as a weapon against its enemies.

I assume you mean New World Order? If so, you're more paranoid and bonkers than I thought.The gay movement is just campaigning for its rights. Northern Ireland refused legislation for gay marriage - the LGB pepes are pissed off and are trying to get their point across. Legally.

The anti-gay group is the one who filed the lawsuit in the Houston case. They are the ones who took legal action.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

One World Order?The world you live in must be terrifying.

Who do you think is censoring you? The idiocy you display in this reasoning is amazing. Do you think maybe you have just hit the point of where people are tired of reading your hate?Must be the Jesuits.