Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Depositional Models of Sea Transgressions/Regressions - Walther's Law
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 140 of 533 (726483)
05-09-2014 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
05-09-2014 10:23 AM


NN says everybody has thought about my arguments and they don't work. That's what everybody always says and then you show you don't have a clue as NN did on the thread about genetic diversity, not a clue. Or RAZD either. At least stop thinking you get it when you don't.
That's just what you say when you've been proven utterly wrong.
**hey guys, know what? The sky is green.
-Um, no. Look at this picture, its blue
**YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING
Your ideas are not that hard to follow, they're just incredibly misguided and painfully wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 05-09-2014 10:23 AM Faith has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 533 (726764)
05-12-2014 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by Faith
05-12-2014 9:59 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
I AM right about this and you WOULD see it if you would just think.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 9:59 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 10:15 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 195 of 533 (726770)
05-12-2014 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by Faith
05-12-2014 10:15 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
When you're trying to convince someone of something, you show them the evidence for your assertion. You don't just tell them that you are right and that they would know it if they thought about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 10:15 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 12:44 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 533 (726824)
05-13-2014 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by Faith
05-13-2014 10:06 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
It doesn't matter if a particular layer thickens or thins, I keep trying to say that, the point is that they ALL FOLLOW THAT CURVY PATH SHOWN ON THE DIAGRAM as a blocki.
What did you expect?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Faith, posted 05-13-2014 10:06 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024