Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-15-2019 3:58 PM
28 online now:
dwise1, edge, jar, ooh-child, PaulK, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (6 members, 22 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: lopezeast0211, Theodoric
Post Volume:
Total: 856,797 Year: 11,833/19,786 Month: 1,614/2,641 Week: 123/708 Day: 57/66 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Depositional Models of Sea Transgressions/Regressions - Walther's Law
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 140 of 533 (726483)
05-09-2014 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
05-09-2014 10:23 AM


NN says everybody has thought about my arguments and they don't work. That's what everybody always says and then you show you don't have a clue as NN did on the thread about genetic diversity, not a clue. Or RAZD either. At least stop thinking you get it when you don't.

That's just what you say when you've been proven utterly wrong.

**hey guys, know what? The sky is green.

-Um, no. Look at this picture, its blue

**YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING

Your ideas are not that hard to follow, they're just incredibly misguided and painfully wrong.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 05-09-2014 10:23 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 533 (726764)
05-12-2014 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by Faith
05-12-2014 9:59 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
I AM right about this and you WOULD see it if you would just think.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 9:59 AM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 10:15 AM New Cat's Eye has responded

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 195 of 533 (726770)
05-12-2014 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by Faith
05-12-2014 10:15 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
When you're trying to convince someone of something, you show them the evidence for your assertion. You don't just tell them that you are right and that they would know it if they thought about it.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 10:15 AM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Faith, posted 05-12-2014 12:44 PM New Cat's Eye has not yet responded

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 533 (726824)
05-13-2014 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by Faith
05-13-2014 10:06 AM


Re: To edge: no tectonic activity in Grand Canyon Paleozoic
It doesn't matter if a particular layer thickens or thins, I keep trying to say that, the point is that they ALL FOLLOW THAT CURVY PATH SHOWN ON THE DIAGRAM as a blocki.

What did you expect?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Faith, posted 05-13-2014 10:06 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019